From another thread in another Forum It caused alarm bells to go off. My definition of inspiration and the Bible precludes the KJVO position, which, in fact DENIES inspiration, often adds DOUBLE inspiration, and elevates a translation to the status of the Greek/Hebrew. That is the same as "liberals/modernists/neo-orthodox" do in THEIR thinking of inspiration. Is there a parallel? Are we looking a truly a FALSE DOCTRINE that should be refuted as we would other liberal doctrines such as denying the virgin birth, etc? The floor is open . . .