Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Oct 23, 2013.
Well yeah...who knows what parents would feed their kids. And don't you know - it takes the government to raise a child.
An incredible waste of a doctor's time.
This is another government intrusion into our lives. I wouldn't characterize it as liberal, per se. This is actually a Head Start program. I would guess the policy was in effect during the Bush era as well.
Actually, it was instituted in 2010.
OK, even so, it's more a thing of governmental control than liberalism. I suppose they don't want parents giving kids in the Head Start program lunch because:
1.) Head Start meals are subsidized. If too many parents fed their own kids they would lose or have that funding decreased for meals. "Use it or lose it."
2.) Low income parents might feed their kids junk food.
Have you investigated your local schools' lunch menus lately? I wouldn't eat that crap either. I doubt Head Start is any better.
That's like saying, it's more about water flow than current.
You're forced to grasp at contradictions to mitigate the crimes of Obama.
1. Never heard of it
2. No one has applied this to any President until you
3. It is liberal per se as conservatives would never do something like this.
Every week. My 16 year old says they are pretty good.
My three children still at home hate our school lunches. Some days there are not enough food and they do not get lunches and the food they get is lousy and expensive. We send lunches to school.
I hear that a lot. I'm glad that our school district has somewhat decent lunches, as making lunches is a hassle. And there never is enough for a 16 year old boy!