1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Luke 4:16-21

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by HankD, Sep 11, 2004.

  1. Archangel7

    Archangel7 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Ethiopian eunich was obviously *not* God. Did the Ethiopian eunuch have that same right when he read aloud from a different version of Isa. 53:7-8? (See Ac. 8:27-35).
     
  2. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's true unless we're talking about Mary being his mother.
     
  3. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Plain ol'Ralph:Careful, "robycop" some thinkest thou art mad by thy much speaking, you appear as one that beateth the air.

    While I do thinketh some KJVos be mad by their much making of excuses and gainsay.

    And until some one comes up with authenticated MSS to support your premise it is become NOTHING but conjecture and has no objective worth, neither can conjecture without infallable proof be considered subjective..

    I think you have some authenticated mss...those which were used to make the KJV. The writings are there for all to see.
     
  4. AVL1984

    AVL1984 <img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,506
    Likes Received:
    62
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The problem with that, friend,is the multiple omissions and contradictions infused within their pages, excluding the KJB in that statement. Then the subject must be introduced: MSS.

    I suppose then we must conclude to having a Complete Final Authority w/o man's tampering with proven false MSS?

    Yes. [​IMG]
    </font>[/QUOTE]I don't see where any of the manuscripts have been proven false, POR. The KJV is not a perfect version, and that IS fact. :eek: So, if you believe it is, please tell me which version of the KJV is perfect...and also which of the two types is perfect, the Cambridge? The Oxford? The 1611? The 1762 (1769), or the one from the 1800's? :confused: Which? And, if this is the perfect Word of God and the only one, where was the perfect Word of God before 1610? Eh? :rolleyes:

    Also, care to prove what you're saying about omissions and deletions, etc? They are true to their underlying texts, and all the same doctrines and fundamentals are taught in the MV's as in the KJV.

    AVL1984
    </font>[/QUOTE]When you allow the evil influences of the powers of darkness to provide you with facts, I could almost agree &lt; NOT1
    </font>[/QUOTE]In other words, you're going to avoid the questions. Typical of someone who is like a cloud without rain. I don't allow the powers of darkness to provide me with facts. The Bible, no matter what version I use is very clear that Jesus is Lord. Until you can prove that I or anyone else here let the "powers of darkness" provide us with facts, then you're spitting into the wind, friend. :eek:

    AVL1984
     
  5. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Page five warning:

    This thread is liable to closure at any time.
     
Loading...