Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Jun 19, 2014.

  1. Revmitchell

    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Feb 18, 2006
    Likes Received:
    A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.
    The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.
    PHOTOS: Top 10 U.S. fighter jets
    The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
    “This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
    Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”
    “Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.
    “In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” under two conditions.
    The conditions include military support needed “to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order.” A second use is when federal, state and local authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.”
    “Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.
    Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.
    A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
  2. poncho

    Expand Collapse

    Mar 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    Thank you neocons. Obama could never have done it without all of your paranoid fear mongering the creation of the DHS and the U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T acts and other violations of the constitution you all championed at the time. :applause:

    I told y'all before the neocons even started usurping the constitution in earnest it would come to this.

    Naw, it was all a "conspiracy theory" that the government would eventually turn all it's new "counter terrorism" powers against US citizens. Only a kook would believe government's ever turn on their own people. :tonofbricks:
    #2 poncho, Jun 19, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 19, 2014
  3. pinoybaptist

    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Mar 17, 2002
    Likes Received:
    Obama can go ahead and do what he thinks he can do.
    I am confident when push comes to shove, there will be those within the establishment itself, and the armed forces, who will REFUSE to the point of anything to shoot and kill American civilians on American soil.

Share This Page