MIS-information Is Ancient History

In the early 90s i visited the Bible Museum
at Eureka Springs, Arkansas. Across the
street at the book store i bought a $2
copy of one page of an original King James
Version 1611 edition (KJV1611).
I have been using the internet or it's
precussors since 1984. So i got on the
search engine i used at that time
and checked using "KJV1611". At that time
i found that no place you can find using
"KJV1611" uses the KJV1611. Instead they
usually use the KJV1769 (or is that KJV1762).
I had my first run-in with virtual KJV-Onlyists.

90% of the King James Version Bibles
produced in the 20th century (1901-2000)
have no information that there are
various editions of the King James Version.

 

Ever since I've been debating with Onlyists, I've seen that they shovel into the garbage pile every 6 months or so, to dredge up old garbage, long refuted, that simply smells worse with age, as they actually find someone gullible enough to fall for their myth. Some of these "oldies that were never goodies" are:

In Isaiah 14:12, the MVs substitute Jesus for the devil by reading "morning star" rather than "Lucifer".

The MVs have copyrights, while the KJV does not, meaning the MVs are made and sold to make filthy lucre.

The MVs leave out Christ's blood in several verses.

The MVs are made from incorrect mss.

Westcott and Hort, the "fathers" of the texts from which MVs are made, were closet Catholics and also practicing mystics.

Dean John Burgon was KJVO.

The MVs leave out umpteen hundred words.

Now, we get into some of their REALLY STUPID assertions:

The "provisional Bible" trash, where they say the English Bibles made before 1611 are "fill-ins", serving the English until "that which is perfect"-the KJV-was made.

The MVs deny Christ's Divine conception by calling Joseph and Mary "his parents" in Luke 2:43. Apparently the paragons of wisdom who thought this one up had trouble reading five verses further in their KJVs: Luke 2:48, KJV "And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, ***thy father*** and I have sought thee sorrowing.

The Psalm 12:6-7 thing. I might recommend that the KJVOs who advocate that these verses refer to God's words consult a REAL AV 1611 to see the marginal note referring to V.7.

"The KJV corrects the mss from which it was made." Typical Rucky-Mon factoid with its typical veracity.

And, finally, this classic: Gimme the King James that Paul used!"

This is but a short list from the KJVO loony bin, oldies long-refuted, but periodically brought up by some KJVOs in the hope that some new reader may actually half-believe some of them. unfortunately, we then have to go to work and present all the refutations over again, in the hope that we keep the neophytes from falling into the KJVO quagmire.

As Dr. Bob said, it was nonsense then, & it's nonsense now.


"A cowboy's work is never done."

 

WHAT!? ostriches don't put there heads in the sand?

I have also heard that there is no Santa Claus here on the BB!

Things will never be the same.



HankD

 

I suppose next to go will be the tooth fairy.

 

What if the tooth fairy lost her patience and just started ripping teeth out of children willy nilly?

 

They do!!! It is in plain English.

They do!!! When they go bankrupt,they either make it public domain,or $ell it to be re-ha$hed(ESV,for example).

They do in fact;compare any of the 200+ conflicting authorites to the word of God(KJB);only a fool would deny that.

They are!!! Made from the most vile,corrupt texts that ever was scraped out of a dumpster(Sinaiticus),and the RCC's OFFICIALmanuscript,Vaticanus(Revelation 17).

No arguments there...

No,he wasn't.

Yep,and why not!?? Satan did it(Gen 3;Luke 4:10)and good ole' Baalam did too(Numbers 22:12-13),and Jehudi did not think that those fire bound verses were originaly in the "original",so to clear up what God "REALLY" should have said,he broke out the penknife.(Father of textual criticism I suppose).

Yup!!! If the KJB is not it,then what did the poor suckers do for the word of God until 1881??

But He set them straight as to who His Father was;big F,not lower case...

Who cares what some men said?? I tell you who does,men pleasers do;I know what the Bible(KJB) says.

It does!!! Can you prove it doesn't??

Have a look at this LINK

Well,we will see real soon when 2 Corinthians 5:10 happens....I'm ready..

 

What are you implying Bob??? Why dont you just come out and say it???

 

Calling into question my salvation eh?? nice touch ...Do you remember THIS???


It is not hard to see thru your innuendos;you have been taught well!!

 

Come on, it's just a joke! A funny allusion, that's all.

 

Calling into question my salvation eh?? nice touch ...Do you remember THIS???</font>[/QUOTE] Setting up a test by which you self identify is not the same as making a definitive statement...

BTW, you aren't being questioned because of "preferrence". You are being questioned because of your persistence in error despite having been shown the truth.

 

A-A,

Please, get a grip.

HankD

 

I love it

Doctrine from a comic book.

[sarcasm] I like the WoF stuff i get
from Scrooge McDuck comics. [/sarcasm]

 

Oh, i though you were going to start
a chain of ostrich-burger stores

 

I love it

Doctrine from a comic book.
</font>[/QUOTE]What's wrong with putting your message in a form everyone can understand? Would you be happier if his tracts were in 17th century English?

The way things are going, in a few years The Message will be too erudite for everyone to understand and we'll need Jack Chick to come to the rescue with a Graphic Novel Version of the Holy Bible!

BTW, How do you answer the content of the article linked to? What he's saying makes good sense to me.

 

Yup!!! If the KJB is not it,then what did the poor suckers do for the word of God until 1881??</font>[/QUOTE]If the KJV *is* it, then what did the poor suckers do for the word of God until 1611?