On a now-closed thread, a member states that some newer BVs have verses missing, and mentions a list of verses he believes are missing. Shoot, I'll even provide the source for such a list: http://www.picknowl.com.au/homepages/rlister/bible/mbds.htm Please be advised that I don't believe too much of what Moorman has to say outside the Gospel message; much of it is the same ole PROVEN-FALSE KJVO hooey. And here's another: http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/nivdelet.htm Please check out the HOME PAGE of this one. This is just about as complete a collection of KJVO idiocy and heresy as can be found in the net. However, the subject is MISSING VERSES. Let's see some PROOF that the verses are really missing. Just because "they're in the KJV bUt not in this other version" isn't proof beyond that actual statement. Can you prove they weren't ADDED to later manuscripts or to some Bible versions? We've posted many differences between the various books of the Bible where different books are narrating the same events. We MUST apply the same reasoning we use to recognize the differing versions of the same story as Scripture to the differences between Bible versions or we're using a DOUBLE STANDARD.