1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Mitt Romney Economic Adviser Calls For Raising Taxes On The Rich, Contradicting Entir

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Crabtownboy, Nov 14, 2012.

  1. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Finally some sanity from the Romney advisers ... a little late, but better late than never. Obviously they knew this all along, but were playing politics. I expect if Romney had been elected he would have proposed raising taxes on the wealthy. He had no qualms about switching sides often during the campaign.

    I do not subscribe to the Financial Times[/], so I cannot link to the original article.


     
    #1 Crabtownboy, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 14, 2012
  2. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why average and not marginal tax rate? The whatevertheycallit minimum tax which is scheduled to be imposed on most working families would be extended? Starting at what income level?
     
  3. exscentric

    exscentric Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,366
    Likes Received:
    47
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "He had no qualms about switching sides often during the campaign."

    Could be true and often enough said, but in all the months of the circus did I see any listing of all these changes.

    Ex may be significant in the "adviser" that proves Romney changed his mind????

    It was all Symantecs anyway. What is the difference whether you raise something (taxes) or change the way you figure something (loopholes) to raise it. It means more money out of the guys pocket that made it going to the guys that have their hands in the rich guys pockets. No matter how you cut it it is big government taking from the rich and giving to the poor only they ain't no Robin Hoods - there isn't anything birdie about any politician.
     
Loading...