More Troops Going to Iraq?

Discussion in '2006 Archive' started by LadyEagle, Dec 16, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
  2. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    From the story:

    "But the top generals in the region warn that such a dramatic escalation would not only risk more American lives, it might discourage Iraqis from taking charge of their own security."

    Hopfully these generals will prevail.
     
  3. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let us pray. I recall another President who went by the name of LB Johnson who also felt he knew more than his generals. I pray Bush does not repeat his mistakes. I will say this for Bush Sr., he let the generals run the war.
     
  4. StefanM

    StefanM
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    70
    I think President Bush is in a dream world. When is he going to figure out that ignoring experienced generals = bad news?

    It seems to me that his national guard training likely did not prepare him to outwit a cadre of top-tier generals.
     
  5. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    How are the Iraqis supposed to take over their own security when the top military and civil police were ousted, when they are ill-equipped and ill-trained. For that matter, which Iraqis are supposed to take over?
     
  6. Martin

    Martin
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Likes Received:
    0
    ==I disagree. I do not think that President Bush is in a dream world, nor is he in denial, rather Bush is trying to save his presidency. If he starts a pull out, in '08 or at any other point before his stated goals have been reached, then he is admitting defeat. What he will try to do is put more troops in hoping that the addition of those troops will help bring some stability to the area. Once that is done he would be able to claim that progress is being made and that we should not abandon such progress. The result? Our troops would be in Iraq for at least two more years. Keep in mind that Bush has said that there will be no pullout while he is president. Don't let those remarks escape your memory. I hope, and pray, that I am wrong and that Bush goes a different direction. However I am doubtful that I am wrong on this. All the signs are there, Bush is trying to save his failed presidency.
     
  7. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    The ones our military has been training. It's been almost four years. We trained millions of men in less than four years during World War II.
     
  8. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    :laugh: :laugh: :wavey: :thumbs:​
     
  9. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not to mention, we've taken raw recruits who have served their complete military hitch in Iraq and are now out of the military in these past 4 years.
     
  10. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well, here's the update 12/20/2006:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/19/AR2006121900880_pf.html
     
  11. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm glad he finally agree's he can't keep sending the same troops into harms way. It will definately have a impact on their future.
     
  12. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    True, but the trainers spoke the same language as the trainees then rather than using grunts and gestures, and the trainees had no choice. Our volunteers were not gunned down as they stood in line to sign up.

    Are we planning to fully arm them and to give them the same logistical support as we give our own? How will they be fed and clothed - and who will take care of their families left behind in a dangerous and financially insecure situation?
     
    #12 Daisy, Dec 20, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 20, 2006
  13. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/rpt/1227/73928.htm

    By September 18 approximately 302,200 Iraqi soldiers and police had completed initial training and equipping, an increase of more than 33,800 in the three months since the July 2006 report. As of September 18, approximately 95 percent of the end-strength of MOD forces were initially trained and equipped with more than 92 percent of authorized Iraqi Army battalions assembled. Remaining train-and-equip efforts will focus on building combat support and combat service support forces.
     
  14. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    If they are 92% of authorized Iraqi Army battalions assembled, why would America need to send more troops? Don't you see a conflict in what we are being told?
     
  15. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    I do. But considering Iraqi troops bite the heads off of frogs and eat beating hearts out of live bunnies to show their courage, yet have been documented to run away in the heat of battle, nothing surprises me.
     
  16. El_Guero

    El_Guero
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen!

    :thumbs:

     
  17. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just ran into an interesting fact...

    The world's largest armies

    * People's Republic of China: 2,225,000 troops

    * United States: 1,426,713

    * India: 1,325,000

    * North Korea: 1,106,000

    * Russia: 1,037,000

    * South Korea: 687,000

    * Pakistan: 619,000

    * Turkey: 514,850

    * Vietnam: 484,000

    * Egypt: 450,000

    SOURCE: CSIS/DOD
     
  18. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks. It is interesting.
     
  19. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think our military needs to be 2.5 million strong to protect our borders and our interests elsewhere. That would be still be less than 1% of our population.
     
  20. saturneptune

    saturneptune
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is very hard to admit. Of all the elections I have voted in, this was the biggest mistake ever made, and I voted twice for this guy. I thought the vote for Nixon was a mistake, but this takes the cake. This president is going through melt down.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...