Most likely terrorists? White Americans...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by rbell, Jul 22, 2011.

  1. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    SOURCE

    According to the DHS and its monumentally misguided, dangerous, and unAmerican leader--Janet Napolitano--our biggest thread comes from within, and it's predominantly white Americans we should be worried about.

    Big Sis (Sis?? I say 50/50 it's "Big Bro," or just "Pat") and her ilk simply love to play the political correctness game, and pit one group against another. I found this interesting...virtually all of the "troublemakers" in the video were Caucasian. Virtually all who turned them in were of non-Caucasian descent. Were you to flip that around, the outcry would have been deafening.

    Perhaps more disturbing is the intimations that are made that those of a conservative or libertarian bent are trouble. This eruption of profound stupidity and absolute spite comes from DHS’ own internal documents.

    Big Whatever is just evil enough to use the DHS post as a launching pad for policies that support her (?) prejudices. Scary, it is.

    If you need a reason to actively campaign against Obama, there you go. He puts inept bigots into some of the most powerful positions in our nation. (Remember--Napolitano and the evil racist AG Eric Holder wouldn't even admit that the Fort Hood shooter's radical islamic beliefs played a role in his massacre!)

    How long will we put up with this?
     
  2. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    It looks to me like DHS was trying to be overly PC.
     
  3. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Until we all finally realize the "war on terror" is now and always has been a giant farce and that we Americans and our liberties are now and always have been the main targets in this so called "war".
     
  4. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    "War on terror" is the domino theory renamed. Been going on since the end of WW2. The one thing Robert Welch got right is that WW2 NEVER actually ended.
     
  5. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    WW2 is when the military industrial complex and the CIA were born. Neither care to give up on the power and riches war and destruction bring.

    While we've been so busy flogging each other about our differing ideologies (liberals vs conservatives, republicans vs democrats, lefties vs righties) Big Boss capitalism (global bankers and corporitos) have been busy looting our treasury via the "bailouts" while the militay gang aka the MIC has been looting us via expensive neverending and expanding "wars" financed by Big Boss on behalf of and using the wealth of the American taxpayer.

    The people are coming to realize this, (not the people here of course, I'm talking about the people who have been paying attention to facts and documents instead of the talking corporate heads) hence the need for Big Boss's expanding role in domestic security. Big Boss don't like to be asked questions or be held accountable by the people he's looting.

    Those who would question or try to hold him accountable are to be considered radicals and extremists that are betraying their county and are a grave danger to us all. They are "the enemy".

    They, is you and me folks. Well, me probably more than you because while most of you were all wrapped up all cozy in your flags and blind patriotism I was claiming the "war on terror" was a giant scam from the get go.

    We Americans and our outdated ideas about individual liberties, national sovereignty and God given rights are the "enemy of the global state", expect to be treated as such even if you do keep your head buried firmly in the sand and submit to whoever claims to be "Ceasar".
     
    #5 poncho, Jul 23, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 23, 2011
  6. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0

    Paul, what's scary is that is the best of a bad lot of possibilities.

    DHS as a whole is no doubt being PC. But Holder and Napolitano, I'm afraid, have a deep-seated hatred or fear of people that love freedom, are conservative in nature, or who question their unAmerican beliefs, radical policies, and abjectly stupid decisions.
     
  7. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Blah, makes me sick...
     
  8. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128

    If these are the policies of a few wacky liberals in the USA then why are the same type of policies being enforced in other parts of the world?

    Hint, read what it says below in my signature line.
     
    #8 poncho, Jul 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2011
  9. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    OSLO (Reuters) - The man suspected of Norway's gun and bomb massacre had belonged to an anti-immigration party and opposed multi-culturalism, Islam and the "cultural Marxists" of the establishment, web postings, acquaintances and officials said Saturday.

    Anders Behring Breivik was accused of gunning down 85 people at a youth camp and killing another seven in a bomb attack on Friday.

    "Before we can start our crusade we must do our duty by decimating cultural marxism," said a caption under a video called "Knights Templar 2083" on the YouTube website.

    SOURCE


    'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

    This was the essence of Operation Gladio, a decades-long covert campaign of terrorism and deceit directed by the intelligence services of the West -- against their own populations. Hundreds of innocent people were killed or maimed in terrorist attacks -- on train stations, supermarkets, cafes and offices -- which were then blamed on "leftist subversives" or other political opponents. The purpose, as stated above in sworn testimony by Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra, was to demonize designated enemies and frighten the public into supporting ever-increasing powers for government leaders -- and their elitist cronies.

    SOURCE

    Get ready to hear more reports of domestic terrorism by "right wing" crazies proving of course that Big Sis knows what's best for us after all. And what is best is for us to submit to Big Sis!

    "If you aren't with us, you're with the terrorists" G. W. Bush president of the United States.
     
    #9 poncho, Jul 24, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2011
  10. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    “White Alqaeda” targeted as western governments turn terror apparatus inward

    The government narrative of the “White Alqaeda” threat has been ongoing for at least 3 years now. The latest bombing in Norway is continuing the saga. In a recent development, a report from USA Today reads, “A police official tells the Associated Press that today’s terror is more like the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing by Timothy McVeigh than the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center by Islamist fundamentalists.”

    This event is feeding into a growing trend in which western governments are turning their anti-terror apparatus inward. The Department of Homeland Security recently released a video in which the depiction of terrorist activity involved white men in every threat scenario.Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano recently made clear that domestic terrorism is at the center of the government’s focus.

    In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, Time Magazine printed an article in which the government’s post-bombing propaganda campaign is expressed vividly. The article stated in part that individuals like Timothy McVeigh “…drew on widespread mistrust and even hatred of government power… Their coalition included well-known elements of far-right thought: tax-protesters; Christian home-schoolers; conspiracy theorists influenced by the John Birch Society’s fear of one-world government; Second Amendment activists for whom guns are an important part of an independent way of life; self-reliant types who resent a Federal Government…”

    SOURCE
     
  11. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Police Knew Gunman’s Name Before Arrest

    British news anchor questions how authorities were aware of Breivik’s identity in advance,

    Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.

    During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.

    “He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.

    Snow also posed the question on his official Twitter page.

    SOURCE

    The rush to blame Muslims for the carnage, hastily parroted by an onslaught of mainstream “terror experts,” was a startling insight into how the propaganda that fuels the war on terror is so unquestionably bounced around the echo chamber of the corporate media.

    It’s also a reminder that the mainstream press instantly falls in line with whoever the establishment designates the enemy du jour to be at any given time. Now that Muslims have been so vehemently demonized as terrorists, it’s the turn of so called “right-wing extremists,” or anyone who disagrees with mass immigration, loss of sovereignty and globalist financial looting, to feel the heat.

    The effort to smear European conservatives as unhinged radicals who harbor simmering urges for bloodlust is now in full swing, and it’s a demonization campaign firmly founded on the carefully crafted public portrayal of Anders Behring Breivik.

    However, it’s quickly becoming apparent that just as many eyewitnesses reported two gunmen on the island where the rampage unfolded, there are two different personas behind Breivik himself.

    Indeed, there are two different Facebook profiles for Breivik, one from before the massacre and one from after. The latter profile appears to have been embellished and deliberately altered to emphasize the notion that the gunman was motivated by his “Christian conservative” beliefs.

    Compare the two profiles below (click to enlarge). The first one in Norwegian was deleted minutes after Breivik’s identity became public. The second profile in English appeared after the original was deleted, and became the de facto profile of the killer.

    “Several things have been doctored up to alter the suspects political views. First a section titled “Philosophy” has been added to include “Christian,” and “Conservative.” The media has used this to great lengths,” notes the Council of Conservative Christians website.

    In the second profile, Breivik’s interest in Winston Churchill and Max Manus, the leader of the Norwegian anti-Nazi resistance, have been deleted, presumably because they don’t fit with the psychological profile that Breivik was a right-wing neo-Nazi who had links with the English Defence League.

    There was clearly manipulation surrounding Breivik’s Facebook page after the attack. As Madison Ruppert notes, “Someone was active on Breivik’s Facebook accepting friend requests after the massacre took place.” People were also tricked into registering on a fake Facebook page set up in support of the gunman’s actions.

    Additionally, in a series of Internet postings, Breivik clearly characterizes himself not as a populist Christian conservative, as the media has attempted to push, but as a Bill Kristol style neo-con, an enthusiastic supporter of Israel, attacking racists and accusing others of being “anti-gay”.

    “None of the comments are extreme or hint at a desire to commit violence,” notes the CCC website, adding that Breivik was a supporter of the website which was run by Hans Rustad, a former Jewish left-winger turned neo-conservative.

    It seems as if there are two Breivik’s, the original, a socially liberal, pro-Israel neo-con, and the second post-massacre profile of a Christian conservative, white supremacist. The second profile has clearly been embellished to push the notion that Breivik’s rampage was driven by his Christian conservative beliefs, which is convenient given the fact that governments recently introduced the meme that white, Christian conservatives were the leading terror threat.

    SOURCE

    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me.

    Martin Niemöller

    Now they're after YOU! And most of you will no doubt still ridicule those who've been speaking out on your behalf.
     
    #11 poncho, Jul 25, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 25, 2011

Share This Page

Loading...