1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

MTA Violating 4th Amendment Rights

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Steadfast Fred, Jan 20, 2011.

  1. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is what will bring this nation down as we know it, not the terrorists.
     
  2. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Then just say you dont want to answer my question.
     
  3. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    I always try and answer. Sometimes I do miss a question. What exactly were you asking?
     
  4. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    I'm not talking about taking the nation down - I'm talking about taking PEOPLE down. I'm all for life. :)
     
  5. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Bill, I am so glad you are giving us the BARE facts :tongue3:

    So I assume that "I'm going to Heaven and I cant Wait" is not one of your favorite choruses?
     
  6. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    He just makes sure it's the naked truth.



    Well, I CAN wait a little while. ;)
     
  7. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand what you are talking about, but the way you want to do it is to take down the nation as it was founded. If you feel safe you do not care if others suffer their loss of freedoms and rights. I want people safe, but not at that expense. I want different methods to be used and at the same time protect our nations liberties and freedoms.
     
  8. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    Let's look at the airline industry - or the MTA - you pick. Just how would you propose to keep people safe? Honestly, I think today it's harder and harder to do so.
     
  9. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0

    [SIZE=+0][SIZE=+0][SIZE=+0]I agree it is harder and harder, but not impossible and stripping away our rights is not the answer. Stripping them away may be easy, but it is not the solution. Once they are gone they will never return and worst it opens the door for more to be taken. First the airlines are not safe. The holes in the security is an outrage this long after 911, and the people have been duped into a false sense of security by the socialist agenda forcing the nation to give up her rights and freedoms. The same kind of mind set was used to bring Nazi Germany to the place it came. I would also point out that the next step will be body cavity bombs. Remeber it does not matter to a terrorist if they blow up from the outside or the inside. Do you want a full body cavity search to get on a plane? Please answer. It could mean you would be safer.

    Now a different method: First nothing is full proof and especially the current methods. However a system that is at least equal with the current one, and I think safer, and that does not rip away our rights, freedoms and dignity is far better. Also I am not against the full body searches for a just cause, but not for random reasons as is being done now. I am against the body scanners for every person except non citizens, as they are an invasion of privacy. Every non citizen should have to go through the full body scans and the full body pat downs, no exceptions. Yes this is a form of profiling and I am totally for it with the non citizen.
    When you go to jail or are arrested you get a full body pat down. In fact you usually remove your clothing and spread wide for a visual, but not everyone who goes out for a drive gets one nor do people get pulled over and one given at random. Even if we do get pulled over unless there is reason to believe that this person is dangerous or they are cuffed and arrested they are not given a body search. It should be no different to travel.

    Every bag, carry on or checked package should be scanned. This is not the case even today. There is nothing wrong with the metal detectors.
    Let TSA or MTA use basic passenger-reservation data to identify the riskiest travelers and single them out for extra attention — the same data that customs officials already use at the border, but not random without cause searches or scans. Evasive body scans and or body searches just to travel on certain types or any type of public transportation is not what this nation is about.

    Another way is the Las Vegas model. Big casinos employ some of the tightest security standards on the planet, yet almost all of it remains hidden behind the scenes.
    Security personnel constantly monitor hundreds of cameras. The officers are highly trained to recognize suspicious activity and their plain-clothes men colleagues on the casino floor can appear instantly out of seemingly nowhere to nip a potential incident or crime in the bud.
    Another is the Israel method. Also the government agencies need to be linked with all the data on those who have already been identified as possible threats. The system needs to be automatically used to check every person who checks in.
    These are some, but mostly it needs to be done by record checks, and personal evaluation. Not random checks that strips away every persons rights.
    All this working collectively to give a reasonable method of security, which we do not have today, without ripping away the freedoms and rights and dignity of the citizens.

    [/SIZE]
    [/SIZE][/SIZE]
     
    #29 freeatlast, Jan 22, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 22, 2011
  10. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    First things first.

    The basis for your complaint is that the government is doing the searches. That implies that you would have no complaint if an airline or and airport employee did the searces?

    Is that so?
     
  11. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Correct, because the airlines would not be violating my rights and I could choose another airline.
     
  12. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist

    And if they all did searches?

    I suggest you are splitting hairs.
     
  13. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    2
    Except for two funerals a continent away I have not flown in 10 or 15 years. maybe 25 years. Planes are fine but I don't like being without my own car at the other end. Don't like airport NAZIs.
     
  14. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Then I would either consent to the search or I would find another way to travel.

    And I suggest that you're not capable of understanding the difference between a government overstepping its authority and forcing an illegal search on a citizen and an agreement between a citizen and a private entity.
     
  15. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Typically, we drive everywhere, anyway. With nine of us, flying is prohibitive and driving is more enjoyable, anyway. There's no school waiting for the kids and no boss waiting for the wife and me, so we can just take our time and stop and see the sights.

    Plus, I just like to drive (not to mention being able to stop in the Carolinas and pick up fireworks on the way home!).

    I did fly twice last year without too much hassle, but my brother and law and I were sitting in the airport and my brother in law turned to me and said, "Do you realize that just in the time it's been since we left home, we could have been all the way to Georgia by now?" And we hadn't even boarded the plane yet! By the time we boarded the plane, made the flight, got our luggage, got our rent-a-car, and got to the house, we could have driven and been almost there and saved about $500.
     
  16. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Not capable"? :rolleyes:

    What I understand is that there is no real difference...except in your mind. The reasons for a search and the end result remain the same.

    When the government ceases to regulate and monitor the safety of the air travel industry, I might begin to see the difference.

    That's not going to happen. And I doubt very much you want it to.
     
  17. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    5,360
    Likes Received:
    134
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well, my mind and the Constitution.
     
Loading...