1. Time and time again, I've heard that to Really understand the OT, we must begin with the NT. What in the OT gives us that impression, or What in the NT gives us that impression? 2. If it is true that the only way to understand the OT, we must Rely on the NT, How then did the readers of the OT understand it? Wasn't the OT, without the NT, written to be understood by its readers? Wasn't the OT written in language that they could have understood and appreciated?