First I would like everyone to read the below scripture. I hope you will be convited as I am when I read it. Alot of you seek a Biblical stance for One-Biblism. So here is my "One-Biblism" stance. 1Ti 1:1-8 ESV Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by command of God our Savior and of Christ Jesus our hope, (2) To Timothy, my true child in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord. (3) As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, (4) nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith. (5) The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith. (6) Certain persons, by swerving from these, have wandered away into vain discussion, (7) desiring to be teachers of the law, without understanding either what they are saying or the things about which they make confident assertions. (8) Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, This is the direct word of Paul against the influence of false teachers, who by subtle distinctions and endless disputes, corrupted the purity and simplicity of the gospel. I beleive Whole-Heartedly that this is a direct slam against Version Onlyism, and other variations on Judaism, Gnosticism, and the Colossian Heresy. With Version Onlyism comes confusions. With confusion, comes "myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith." I Tim 1:4. I Tim 1:5-6 Goes on to speak of using "sincere faith", not being "swereved", and "wandered away into vain discussion;". Is it not very clear from at least the versions forum on this board that version onlyism leads to vain discussion! That is why your a memeber here since that is the only subject you post on. I beleive vs. 7 is clear as can be. Can you teach complete understanding even though you choose to attack the Bible? We know that the "flaws" in all modern translations are seen in ancient translations as well, and saying otherwise causes confision. Vs. 8 is simple and pure the law is good! if we use it lawfully. I think the Autograph innerancy stance is more than just seeking proof. You take a charge through faith to stand firm on ONE beleif. "One Beleif!" I don't think there will be to many "myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith." when you take one stance! The Bible has been preserved, the agreement of the manuscripts proves the faithfulness of several transltations. The scriptures as inspired by God are innerant and infallible, and where modern tranlsations agree with the autographs, they are indeed the very word of God. Conservative scholarship affirms the high degree of accuracy to the extant manuscripts, so we can know, without doubt, what the commands of God are. Praise the Lord.