N.Y. Times caught contradicting self on Benghazi

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by poncho, Sep 17, 2014.

  1. poncho

    Expand Collapse

    Mar 30, 2004
    Likes Received:
    A defining, e-book length New York Times article on the Benghazi attack is filled with misleading information, including details negated by the U.S. government, Benghazi victims and numerous other previous news reports, a just-released book exposes.

    The Dec. 28, 2013, New York Times piece by David D. Kirkpatrick was cited by White House officials and Hillary Clinton as confirming central aspects of the Obama administration’s claims about the Benghazi attack.

    However, in his new book, “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary don’t want you to know,” reporter, radio host and New York Times bestselling author Aaron Klein demonstrates Kirkpatrick’s piece is contradicted not only by the State Department and Benghazi witnesses but by Kirkpatrick’s own previous reporting.

    In her memoir “Hard Choices,” Clinton relies on Kirkpatrick’s article, “A Deadly Mix in Benghazi,” to claim an obscure anti-Muhammad video was “indeed a factor” in what happened in Benghazi.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/new-york-times-caught-contradicting-self-on-benghazi/#xx7lkuKqUJI2kceT.99

Share This Page