NY Times: Trump 'right' about Ginsburg's comments

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Jul 13, 2016.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,347
    Likes Received:
    788
    The New York Times's editorial board says Donald Trump is "right" that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's criticisms of him are inappropriate.

    "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling," the newspaper said in an editorial published Wednesday.


    Ginsburg earlier this week slammed the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, saying she "can't imagine what the country would be" like if Trump were to serve as president. The justice also called Trump a "faker" who "has no consistency about him."
    Trump said in response it was "highly inappropriate" that a Supreme Court judge get involved with a political campaign.

    The New York Times said Ginsburg's comments show why Supreme Court justices normally remain silent during presidential campaigns.

    "In this election cycle in particular, the potential of a new president to affect the balance of the court has taken on great importance, with the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia," the paper's editorial board said.

    "As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, other justices are nearing an age when retirement would not be surprising. That makes it vital that the court remain outside the presidential process."

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/287509-nyt-trump-right-about-ginsburgs-comments
     
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,235
    Likes Received:
    616
    You of all people quoting the New York Times. LOL.

    Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
     
  3. Alcott

    Alcott
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,456
    Likes Received:
    93
    The New York Times, of all publications, publishing an editorial that merits being quoted.

    LOL
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,645
    Likes Received:
    311
    Even a broken (analog) clock is correct twice a day.
     
  5. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,404
    Likes Received:
    328
    It's a random act of journalism.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. 777

    777
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    60
    You know she was way over the line when it's too much for the NYT to take.

    She's actively campaigning against Trump while sitting on the USSC. That right there is a conflict of interest and a violation of the separation of powers.

    Rumor has it that RBG wants to retire soon, she is 83 and in poor health, and she's going to retire now matter who wins it this year. She won't move to New Zealand, though.
     
  7. Zaac

    Zaac
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    220
    This has NOTHING to do with separation of powers.

    Members of the legislative branch comment on and campaign for the executive branch elections all the time.

    Is that too a conflict of interest A's a violation of separation of powers?



    Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
     
  8. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,347
    Likes Received:
    788
    • Like Like x 1
  9. 777

    777
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    60
    I'm glad she apologized, but it's too little too late. She has showed her cards and there's no turning back.

    The judicial branch is different, since it's common they have to issue a ruling on matters of the other two branches.

    The executive branch can campaign for/against the legislative branch, and vice-versa. That's NOT a conflict of interest because they aren't ruling for one side, DUH.
     

Share This Page

Loading...