NYT on Benghazi - Diluting the facts???

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by righteousdude2, Dec 30, 2013.

  1. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,460
    Likes Received:
    136
    The truth is ... it doesn't matter is Al Quida or some faction of a terrorist group attacked the Consulate ... THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTS ARE:

    1) It was a terrorist attack...

    2) And Obama did nothing to send in reinforcements prior, to the attack and during the attack!

    The NYT is another media henchman for the administration, attempting to lead the people away from the truth. The truth is: Obama sat by and allowed the unadulterated murder of our Ambassador, and three devoted men hired to protect the Ambassador until help could arive!

    The NYT doesn't have a clue! And they certainly don't care! :tear:

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I am growing weary of the media and their attempts to help Obama hide the truth about Benghazi.

    This shouldn't be pushed under the carpets of the Oval Office, but I think it is close to being hidden forever! And that is truly going to be one more sad realities in this administration's failure to show the kind of leadership this country has lacked since Obama came into office with fanfare and hyperbole that has been replaced by bold-face lies and deception! :tear:
     

Share This Page

Loading...