Obama ignores constitution: 'I won't take no for an answer'

Discussion in 'Politics' started by carpro, Jan 5, 2012.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Obama on Flouting Article 2, Section 2 of Constitution: ‘I Won’t Take No For An Answer’

    By Fred Lucas
    January 4, 2012
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oba...section-2-constitution-i-won-t-take-no-answer
     
    #1 carpro, Jan 5, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 5, 2012
  2. glfredrick

    glfredrick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, what else is new?

    And, this sort of refutes Havensdad's position in another thread that Obama and Bush are the same... Obama is magnitudes more liberal than the moderate Bush, and has caused magnitudes more future change in America than any other sitting President in our history, save George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, both of who, oversaw the creation of our nation in multiple ways.

    Just wait until those reems and reems of passed bills, most over 10,000 pages in length start to kick in. One thing after another in America will start to change by force of law and it will be too late to do anything about it.

    First indicators: Medicare cut by 25% in one of the most under-reported news stories of the decade. Subsidies cut for ethanol, which will radically realign both the farming and fuel industries.
     
  3. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    RP supporters tend to overstate things to defend what is indefensible.
     
  4. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Uh,,,

    Like Bush's 750 "signing statements"? His Executive Orders? His frustration over wanting to enforce the Patriot Act, and his assertion that the "Constitution is just a piece of paper!"?

    Yeah, WAY different... :laugh:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE
     
  5. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    Critics of Ron Paul's supporters do well to ignore Bush's extra-constitutional activities.
     
  6. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Note the last sentence which has been used many times by Republican presidents.

    Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments

    The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

    He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

    The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
     
  7. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slight problem though.

    The Senate is not in recess.
     
  8. glfredrick

    glfredrick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are suggesting moral eqivalence based on the word "signing" instead of looking at WHAT was signed.
     
  9. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Bush made no recess appointments when Congress was not in recess, a clear violation of the constitution.
     
  10. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since he had no regard for the Constitution in any other matter, why on earth do you think he would have it in this one?
     
  11. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    On this we agree, Obama has no regard for the constitution. :thumbs:
     
  12. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was referring to Bush. Glad you agree with me.
     
  13. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    >The Senate is not in recess.

    3 neocon pharisees every day to fulfill the letter of the law?
     
  14. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    I see...and I don't. You lied when you stated Bush "had no regard for the Constitution in any other matter".

    Why would I agree with your lies?
     
    #14 carpro, Jan 5, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 5, 2012
  15. Havensdad

    Havensdad
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    3,382
    Likes Received:
    0
    What lies? Bush flagrantly violated the constitution time and again. He himself said "Enough! Its just a piece of paper!"
     
  16. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Obama's recess appointments were perfectly constitutional. The power to make recess appointments has no lower time limit. The clause in the Constitution has generally been given a practical interpretation. The Republicans can not obstruct the President's power by holding sham pro forma sessions every three days.

    I'm glad he did this because normally he just gives in to the Republicans, which isn't surprising given that he's not a real liberal. He should be a strong leader and be willing to fight sometimes.

    If you want a real example of Obama shredding the Constitution, you should look at the National Defense Authorization Act.
     
  17. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294

    Easy to say. You offer no proof.

    We have proof on the table that Obama is disregarding the constitution.
     
    #17 carpro, Jan 6, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 6, 2012
  18. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Why not?

    Democrats did.

    The difference...Bush did not make appointments when they did. It would have been unconstitutional, just as it is now.
     
  19. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesn't matter which party does it and, yes, it's constitutional to make appointments in this circumstance.
     
  20. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Your statement is opinion only and requires ignoring the actual wording of the pertinent acts to reach the same conclusion that Obama has.

    Hopefully, it will be tested in court.


    The constitution says: "

    The Senate is not in recess. Obama does not care. It's that simple.
     
    #20 carpro, Jan 6, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 6, 2012

Share This Page

Loading...