Obama plans to disarm America

Discussion in 'Politics' started by I Am Blessed 24, May 23, 2008.

  1. I Am Blessed 24

    I Am Blessed 24
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    44,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    From one of the blogs on that page:

    This is absolutely shocking reprehensible. He plans to universally disarm our nation.

    The question is for what, and more specifically “for whom”.


    CLICK HERE TO SEE THE VIDEO
     
  2. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    The sad thing is that rhetoric won't prevent his chances.....We're in trouble in America.
     
  3. I Am Blessed 24

    I Am Blessed 24
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    44,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    He scares ME!
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    It sounds like he is talking about nuclear weapons and delivery systems.

    However, this video does show his shocking naivete which disqualifies him from the White House
     
  5. J.Wayne

    J.Wayne
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    The global community desired by the AC?
     
  6. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Goodness, Roger, maybe this is just another scare tactic with video clipped out of context. [/sarcasm]
     
  7. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I disagree with such a radical downsizing of the United States military. However, I think that even JSM III as president would have to be prudent in defense expenditures as all areas of the federal budget will have to shoulder a share of spending restraint if we are to bring the budget into balance without increasing taxes and stop the financial hemorrhaging that we as a nation are suffering.
     
  8. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78

    I have no problem with substance, you know that. I won't allow you to drag me off track into a comparison of these two videos.
     
    #8 NaasPreacher (C4K), May 24, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2008
  9. dragonfly

    dragonfly
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    I watched the video, and I agree with it completely!
     
  10. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    No weapons for us means we are left without defense. What in the world make shim think he is going to have the power as the president of this country that he can disarm other countries, make them do anything. Sounds like he is quite a bit mixed up.
    Sounds like his plans for ruling go beyond the USA.
    I'm with Sue, this man is scary.
     
  11. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,549
    Likes Received:
    212
    Where I'm currently at, I can't get streaming video, so haven't seen what this one says.

    Based on the replies, I can only make an assumption, and provide a fictional story, based on historical events.

    There were once two tribes. One tribe used bows and arrows, and clubs, to kill their food. The second tribe decided to swear off of such things, and only farmed. One season, the first tribe was unable to kill as much as they needed; they saw that the second tribe had an abundant harvest. The second tribe's leader sat with the first tribe's leader, and offered to share some of their food, but with the provision that they would still have plenty for themselves. The first tribe's leader looked at the other leader, looked at the abundance of food, raised his club, and killed the other leader. The first tribe then took all the harvest, killing anyone who tried to stop them.

    Idealism is great. Reality is, human nature often resorts to "I need, you have, I'll get it."
     
  12. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0

    Reducing the existing stockpile of nuclear weapons was an objective for some time before the Neocons took over with their stated objective of world conquest. I'd like to see the US back down into a powerful and defensible position but one that does not insist on us being "Master's of the World." I'd like to see us rely more on on our allies rather than unilaterally invading other nations. I'm tired of us focusing on war most of the time.
     
  13. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,505
    Likes Received:
    40
    1-
    I'd love to see the printed version of this accusation. (incidentally, I still do not really know what "neocon" entails.)

    2-
    Ditto!

    3-
    Sorry, I don't see these as the only two options. Perhaps you can be more specific?

    I have no problem with the US being the strongest (as opposed to your "master of-" ) in the world.

    This is a far better negotiating position than any other option for us.

    But then perhaps I'm misunderstanding your position, and if so please clarify.
     

Share This Page

Loading...