Featured Obama promoting racism

No. I don't think so. But he is being hypocritical in the extreme considering the punishments handed out to servicemen who were critical of him.

His goal here is to undermine Trump with the military. It won't work. Servicemen who are publicly critical of the Commander-in-Chief, no matter who it is, will face charges under the UCMJ.

 

Obama derangement syndrome.

 

The only racism being promoted there is the typical Breitbart stirring of the pot to get a reaction. Sites like this have done more damage to the union of this country then the sitting President ever has but guys like Rev will happily drink it down and knowingly spread this divisive garbage. Then Rev has the gall to say that "fake news" is a myth while he peddles this swill.

 

Indeed Obama's election did bring out the racists in our society. They could not stand the idea of an African-American being president. So, with twisted logic they now try to reverse who really is the racist.

 

Show us the quote from the source article where Breitbart, or anybody else, mentions race.

 

Ask that to the guy who titled this thread. I'm just following his logic.

 

You're the one that blamed it on Breitbart. He didn't. I knew as soon as I read the article that racism was his interpretation.

So produce the quote.

Or just admit it's your opinion and Breitbart made no such connection.

 

I'm always optimistic Carpro.

He posted a thread about Obama promoting racism in an article that you acknowledged didn't support that and I had some fun using his logic against him. If you are truly on a crusade for the racism quote then go get on his case. You are barking up the wrong tree.

I think we both know you really don't care or you would be going after Rev instead.

 

You clearly stated:

"The only racism being promoted there is the typical Breitbart stirring of the pot to get a reaction."

Where did Breitbart stir the racism pot in this article?

 

Sigh...Read Rev's paragraph after he posts the article where he infers racism into an article where none was mentioned. Now read my post where I do the same. Unless you are suggesting only Rev. Mitch has that kind of freedom then go take your demands elsewhere concerned poster.

To quote Mitch. "Not sure why that has to be explained."

 

Sigh...you're doing what you always do, refusing to take responsibility for a statement that is either wrong, a mistake, or an outright lie.

While I disagreed with the Rev's take on the article and said so, you based your rant on something the article didn't say or even hint at.

Now rants are permissable here, but it takes something away from the validity of your rant when it's based on a falsehood.

When you ranted:

"Sites like this have done more damage to the union of this country then the sitting President ever has but guys like Rev will happily drink it down and knowingly spread this divisive garbage. Then Rev has the gall to say that "fake news" is a myth while he peddles this swill."

That may all be true, but your rant is no better than the "swill" you say Breitbart is spreading when you accuse them of making a racial connection out of Obama's speech in this article. That is demonstrably false.

Just as BLM bases their whole movement on a lie, "hands up , don't shoot", your rant is based on the lie that Breitbart is stirring the racial pot in this news story.

What is patently obvious is that you didn't read the article, or you would never have made such a stupid easily provable false connection. At least I hope so.

Waiting for you next denial of your "mistake".

 

So Rev gets a pass. Got it.

I never mentioned BLM so more goal post moving.

But Breitbart does love to stir the pot and enjoys its rave baiting pieces as well. I stand by that easily.

 

Could be. But using this article as an illustration makes you look like a fool scrambling to make hay out of birdseed.

 

Using this article as an illustration makes one look like a fool scrambling huh? You don't say? Now use the same tone and anger with the OP as you did with me since he is the one who started this dumb thread.

 

I'm shocked that Breitbart had a nice spin on that speech. Just shocked.

 

Yep. Not reading it and then carelessly using it to make a point it does make you look pretty foolish. You couldn't have picked a worse story to make your point. It's a straight news story with no hint of the "swill" you say it has,

What's even worse is not admitting you blew it because you didn't read it first.. The only thing that would have made you look more foolish is if you had read it and still tried to use it as the basis for your rant.

I shudder to think what you believe is a legitimate news source, but I have to ask...do you make up your mind what it says before you read it, as well?

 

Tell it to Rev. Just using his logic. He can do it...I can't got it.