Of Slander, and Libel

Discussion in 'Calvinism/Arminianism Debate' started by Squire Robertsson, Jul 8, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,633
    Likes Received:
    310
    They are not:

    • a difference of opinion.

    • a difference of interpretation of facts.
    For example, I am a Republican in more or less the mold of Theodore Roosevelt. My father (who grew up on a farm during the Depression) is a New Deal Democrat. We have differences of opinion and interpretations of facts. Neither one of us thinks the other is a liar.


    Slander (from the American Heritage Dictionary):

    • Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
    • A false and malicious statement or report about a person.
    Further, Slander is verbal\oral. Libel involves defamation in other forms of communication, for example: the written word, images, or here on the Board.

    So, Slander is not:

    • Asking for proof of a statement.
    • Asking how an opinion was arrived at.
    • Responding to a comment based on a poster's previous posts on the same or other relevant threads.
    Please consider this from Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    In my experience, truth like chlorine bleach is the best for dealing with the stain of libel or slander.
     
  2. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    9,633
    Likes Received:
    310
    Bumpty, bump, bump.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...