Featured Officer kills 17 year old:'How in the world could this happen?' Guilford family speaks out

I think it would have been a much different turnout. This cop:

1.Went into the situation with a bad attitude.
2.Assumed the kid had called his buddies in the militia group.
3.Yanked him out of the vehicle and threw him on the ground.
4.Botched the taser gun by firing it too close to the kid's body
5.Allowed the kid to get up off the pavement and start attacking him.
6. Actually got beat up by a 17 year old juvenile.
7. Had his gun jam.

Had backup arrived incidents 3 through 7 would never have occurred, the kid would be alive and the cop wouldn't have a black eye.

 

And you know this how?

Oh that's right. You don't.

I bet you're a great back seat diver, after your turn has been missed.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

You're right, I don't know this for sure, but it's unlikely the situation would have escalated to the point where the kid would have attempted to overpower two cops. And even if he had tried I assume one of the two taser guns would have been effective, and even if both tasers failed, I find it doubtful that a kid coming off a pot buzz could fight and defeat two cops.

Please describe a viable scenario where a stoned teenager can beat up two cops.

 

But you're forgetting the "gold rule" for good citizenship ITL.

Good citizens should always side with the police and dehumanize our fellow citizens unless it is 100% obvious from the beginning the police were in the wrong.

Which as every good citizen knows happens very rarely if ever.

 

There's the problem. You "assume" a lot and know very little.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

Ann - The second officer wouldn't have pulled the kid out of the car; he would have assisted the first one after he pulled the kid free of the car. Two cops on top of the kid would have more easily restrained the young man. The second officer might also have provided a balancing point that prevented the first one from shooting the kid.

Or he might have joined in and helped beat the kid, and even joined in in shooting him. We'll never know.

 

^ That's reasonable and even prudent. Also, the kid didn't attack until the botched taser shot which at that point sent the situation from irritating to out of control.

 

Bottom line. The young man decided to play roadside lawyer and refused to provide his driver's license.
Since so many want to play this senseless what if game...If he had been cooperative, he would never have been asked to get out of the car. If he had been cooperative, no back up would have been needed.
If when ordered out of the car, he had come willingly, he would not have been tased . No backup would have been called. If he had not resisted arrest and if he had not assaulted the cop, he would not have been shot.
If the young man had acted reasonably, he would be alive today and a police officer would not have to listen armchair quarterbacks, back seat drivers, and 2nd guessing amateurs tell him what WOULD have happened IF he had done things differently. Things I'm sure he has already thought of himself.
Who caused all this? He's dead.

All the proper warnings were given. The cop has been judged by professional, and found to have acted reasonably under the circumstances. Good shooting. 2nd guessing amateurs don't get a vote. Thank God.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

He didn't have his driver's license with him. He called his girlfriend and asked her to bring it. Cop thought he was calling his militia buddies.

As it turns out his girlfriend showed up with Deven's license before police back up arrived. Had the cop waited for backup the girlfriend would have handed over the drivers license, the cop would have never yanked Deven out of the car, and he would still be alive today.

He couldn't cooperate with the cops demand to show his license because he didn't have it with him.

We get it--do as I say and you won't be shot dead.

Now he can listen to a jury.

Judged by his employer to have acted reasonably.

Juries do.

Really? Thank God this boy is dead?!






Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo using Tapatalk.

 

Speaking of police "professionals", here's an example of what passes for "professionalism" in the police profession . . .

FBI Director Says Filming Cops Causes Violent Crime – Admits He Has No Proof

Continue . . . http://thefreethoughtproject.com/li...e-fbi-director-admits-evidence-exists-claims/

ITL, have you figured out yet that it's "dumb" to question the police and how they're being trained?