Orgin of Lanuage

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Salty, Apr 18, 2011.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,130
    Likes Received:
    221
  2. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    First of all, any time I see the words "sophisticated statistical methods" I get skeptical.

    Since the last paragraph tainted the rest, I'm just going to say interesting theory, but theories are made to be disproven.

    However, we do know that all languages began with just one. How God divided them at Babel, *we* don't know.
     
  3. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,219
    Likes Received:
    193
    First of all, this researcher is not a linguist. His Ph. D. is in psychology! And he's done research in evolution. So he is completely unqualified to research languages.

    Secondly, he chose phonemes, the wrong element of language to research! A phoneme is simply a sound, a basic sound of a particular language. What he should have researched is morpheme. A morpheme is the shortest sound with actual meaning in a language. So for example, in English "eh" is a phoneme, but has no meaning. But "-ed" is a morpheme, a sound with meaning. His research on phonemes is meaningless in his study of 500 languages. It reveals nothing like what he wants it to reveal.

    Thirdly, linguists know that languages exist in familes: Indo-European (English, French, Sanskrit etc.), Afro-Asiatic, Altaic, etc. (Japanese is in a class by itself. There are no other similar languages to form a family.) So for example, there is absolutely no similarity between Chinese and Celtic that would indicate a common origin, the thing evolutionist researcher Quentin Atkinson was trying to prove according to this article.

    Finally, since the linguistic data reveals various language families, completely unconnected in their origins, the Babel account in the Bible is very believable. The various languages did not evolve, they were created by God. I fully believe that the source languages that developed into modern language families are what God created when He divided the languages at Babel.
     
  4. John of Japan

    John of Japan
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    12,219
    Likes Received:
    193
    Just as I said, linguists find this research to be very dubious. Here is a quote from one article:

    From: http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080521/full/453446a.html
     

Share This Page

Loading...