Outspoken Arizona Senator Questions 9/11 Official Version

A senator that actually cares about constitution law and US sovereignty, questions big corporate infested government and promotes freedom? Karen Johnson is undoubtedly kooky and most possibly evil.

Full Article...

She's probably with Al Qeada.

 

Angry muslims may have been directly responsible for the act itself but they were protected by the state prior to the attack. In the 1993 WTC bombing one of the "terrorists" worked for the FBI. In the London tube bombing Aswatt was a double agent working for MI6. This is all admitted.

How did Al Qeada get our air defenses to stand down that day? How did Al Qeada get the state to run six seperate terrorist "hijacking" simulations on that same day at ground zero? How did Al Qeada get the British to run a simulation that exactly paralleled what took place on 7/7? Who was the "inside trader"?

Who really benefits? Gary Hart seemed to think the NWO would benefit. Listen here to what he had to say.

I disagree with Ron Paul on this. Always have. And now it looks like other libertarians are starting to disagree with him. Ron Paul did say this about the NWO...

Click Here. Who benefits?

Besides the state has used false flag terrorism as part of it's over all foreign policy for decades. Iran in 1953, and again in Guatemala and other little banana republics all over the globe. If the state has used false flags (which it has...it's documented) to empower it's favored vassals in foreign countries why wouldn't it use it on it's own people to grab power here. You really don't believe people who do this sort thing for a living would have any compunction about doing it in CONUS do you?

 

So then we should ignore the possiblity that people within our own government may have had a hand in the murder of thousands of innocent people? I'm not sure I can do that Bro. Guess I believe in justice too much or something.

No, I don't think it will disappear if we ignore it anymore than I believe the state has our best interests at heart. I think we'll see more of it because the state knows we're to intimidated and submissive to stand up and do anything about it. Like demanding answers.

 

Yeah maybe but no one is able to agree on how that should be done. One thing is for sure it'll never happen if we keep accepting these bought and paid for "candidates" backed by the corporate elite who benefit most from their mutual congenialty.

We can't stop thinking as lefties and righties long enough to figure out the whole government of the United States has been co opted by a foreign power that plays both sides against one another. And it has.

If we try and point out the obvious we're tagged as fruitcakes and lunatics by the corporate controlled media. You saw what they did to Ron Paul and how they tried to paint his supporters as dangerous extremists.

The state is scared stiff that we're begining to wake up to it's off the charts criminality and is already getting it's boot polished to grind in our faces.

Speaking to the vets out there which one of us here joined up and took an took oath to protect and defend all that? I sure didn't.

Guess I better quit now before I alienate even more people.

 

No, actually I was speaking of Emad Salem a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer. Apparently you assumed wrong.

NORAD? Who said anything about NORAD? I said air defenses that would have fallen to the Air National Guard on September 11, 2001.

That's the problem with you official conspiracy theorists. Y'all can't seem to get the official facts straight.

Just doing my duty as a citizen of the USA defending and protecting the U.S. Constitution. Somebody has to do it and obviously it isn't going to be you. I doubt anyone who'll unquestioningly take the state and mass media's word for everything could understand all that anyway. Part of that "worldly attitude" we were warned about having I imagine.