papal succession and supremacy against tradition

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by epistemaniac, May 31, 2006.

  1. epistemaniac

    epistemaniac
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cyprian (200-258 A.D.)
    [​IMG]"For neither does any of us set himself up as a bishop of bishops, nor by tyrannical terror does any compel his colleague to the necessity of obedience; since every bishop, according to the allowance of his liberty and power, has his own proper right of judgment, and can no more be judged by another than he himself can judge another" [Ante-Nicene Fathers, 5:565, "The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian"]. As James White points out, the clergy in Rome were addressing letters to Cyprian, "Pope Cyprian." It simply meant "father."

    The Council of Nicea (325 A.D.)
    [​IMG]
    In Canon 6, this council declared that each center was to be ruled by its own bishop and not by one head over all bishops. [Ante Nicene Father, 7:502, "Constitutions of the Holy Apostles"] The Council of Chalcedon, in Canon 28, declares that Rome's rank was based on its political significance rather than any spiritual superiority.

    St. Jerome (342-420 A.D.)
    [​IMG]"Wherever a bishop may be whether at Rome or at Eugubium, at Constantinople or at Rhegium, at Alexandria or at Thanis, he is of the same worth...for all of them are the successors of the apostles."
    Gregory I (540-604)




    [​IMG]"Now I confidently say that whosoever
    calls himself or desires to be called Universal Priest, is in his elation the precursor of Antichrist, because he proudly puts himself above all others" and compares the man who chooses the title "universal bishop" to Satan. [Gregory I of Rome, Book V, Epistle 18, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II, 12:166]


    http://www.modernreformation.org/popedoc.htm


    blessings,
    Ken
     

Share This Page

Loading...