Parents of Soldiers Killed in Action Seek $40B From Anti-War Shirt Seller

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, May 1, 2008.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    PHOENIX — A Tennessee couple who lost their son in Iraq want an Arizona merchant to pay more than $40 billion in damages to survivors of soldiers whose names are on the anti-war shirts he is selling online.

    Story Here
     
  2. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Disgusting! Parents profiteering off their dead son. They have no compensible damages, their son's death is public record, and the vendor is exercising protected political free speech under the first amendment.
     
  3. chuck2336

    chuck2336
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2

    I agree it is disgusting, BUT I think it is disgusting that someone would print the names of men and women who have paid the ultimate sacrifice for this country on shirts that condemn thier actions!
     
  4. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    As long as we have free speech we will have this type of thing happening ... and I doubt anyone wants us to do away with free speech.

    People can sue over anything, but courts do not have to rule in their favor.
     
  5. sag38

    sag38
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    1
    Disgusting! Parents profiteering off their dead son. They have no compensible damages, their son's death is public record, and the vendor is exercising protected political free speech under the first amendment.
    Reply With Quote


    Even more disgusting are the people publishing the name of their son on a shirt that degrades what their son believed he was fighting for. I'd try to sue them too!! I hope they shut this company down and drain every dime this company has in defending their "freedom of speech."
     
  6. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see the usual cast of characters is all for free speech, as long as it is supports their view. Otherwise it is all about censoring opposing views

    The message is not denigrating the service personnel's sacrifices...rather they point out the vendor's view that Bush lied and sent them to die in a war that should not have happened. Free speech is for all, or no one is free. You may be offended and outraged, but you have no rght to not be offended.

    You pro censorship types need to be careful...it may be YOUR views silened next!

    This case will likely be quickly dismissed, as it should be. I imagine the folks screaming about this were all aver Cindy Shehan who also lost a son in this debacle, but who is anti-war.
     
  7. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    Misusing, for either profit or political purposes' the names of the deceased servicemen has long been a favorite tactic of liberal anti war wackos. It's reprehensible and offensive, but so are the culprits.

    I wish them luck with the suit but I believe it's going nowhere.
     
    #7 carpro, May 1, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2008
  8. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    212
    Just because you have the freedom to speak...doesn't mean you should.
     
  9. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    And hiding the effects of this war has been a tactic of the current administration, i.e. private funerals for soliders with only family members allowed, no photos of flag drapped coffins, no press coverage of horribly wounded in VA hospitals. The mess at Walter Reed would never have been cleaned up if reporters had not gotten around the road blocks put up by DOD and the current admin.
     
  10. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    212
    Let's see: On the one hand, we take the wounded who are being treated shabbily, and we expose the conditions and treatment, in order to make things better.

    On the other hand, in order to make things better, we ignore the grieving families who believe what their children did was their duty, and we ignore their wishes that their children's names not be used in such a way, and we ignore that some of these young men and women volunteered for their second and even third deployment.

    I'm not seeing the correlation between the two cases. The first case didn't involve creating any emotional suffering, only relieving it.
     
  11. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    I was responding to Carpo's political statement.
     
  12. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    212
    That was pretty obvious from the way your response to him included the statement "originally posted by carpro." I was quite aware that you were responding to him, and I still don't see the correlation in your response to him.
     
  13. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,634
    Likes Received:
    158
    Simply that both the right and the left are guilty of attempting to sway opinion their direction.
     
  14. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    It is simply free speech until he turns a profit off of it. Then it moves beyond just free speech to disgusting. and even free speech can be the same.
     
    #14 Revmitchell, May 2, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2008
  15. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    And that has exactly what to do with the topic?
     
  16. chuck2336

    chuck2336
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2

    PLEASE! I am a Christian and as such I AM in the most censored group in America. I am not talking about someones rights, I am talking about respecting those who died for your rights.
     
  17. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    Oh nothing really. It was just an opportunity to get that dig in he has been harboring for a while now.:laugh:
     
  18. chuck2336

    chuck2336
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2
    Having worked at both Walter Reed and Bethsda Medical Centers I can promise you that if the adminstration wanted to keep people out no one would have gotten around anything. These are the hospitals that presidents and political big wigs use and they are set up in a way that makes shutting them completly down possible. IF the government was trying to hide something we would not know about it today. The Walter Reed blocks was primarly from the C.O. and the X.O. of the hospital thats it. I know this blows the floor out from under any conspiricy thoughts one may have, but the truth does have that effect.
     
  19. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    The most censored group in America? Puhleeeez! With Christian TV & Radio all over the dial, churches on every corner, your First Amendment rights to talk to people about Christianity, and more, you are NOT censored. Too many Christians have a persecution complex, apparently you included.
     
  20. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    Being available in some areas is not proof that we are not being pushed out of other areas. Of course those with a secular dual life mndset have no probolem with this.
     

Share This Page

Loading...