Parts of USA PATRIOT Act ruled unconstitutional

Discussion in '2007 Archive' started by Magnetic Poles, Sep 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    A federal judge has stood up for the Constitution, by ruling parts of the Patriot Act violate the probable cause provisions of the Fourth Amendment.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20999950/

    Good news for real patriots!
     
  2. moondg

    moondg
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope this is good I do not know we will see.
     
  3. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. Joe

    Joe
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    Inho, it's very good. They have been trying to take away our freedom under the "guise" of terrorism for a long while now. The newspapers and media are promoting this propaganda, trying to scare us into handing the government our God given freedoms one by one.
     
  5. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    What Joe said... :applause:
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    Fingerprints at a crime scene are not "probable cause"?
     
  7. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is not the ed of it to be sure.
     
  8. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    But hopefully the end is getting closer. :)
     
  9. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    Defense attorneys all over the country are licking their chops.:1_grouphug:
     
  10. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm so happy I could :( !!!! Finally!!!
     
  11. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    From browsing Reason:

     
  12. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ahem:

    Can you say, "Mob Lynch?"

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/119690.html
     
  13. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,547
    Likes Received:
    212
    No. You should be able to figure out why.
     
  14. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    I can't, Don. Help ?
     
  15. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    From the ACLU:


    Perhaps most troubling:

    Also, from Cato:

    http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6330
     
    #15 Ivon Denosovich, Sep 28, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2007
  16. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can help Bro. Curtis.

    A fingerprint found in a public place is meaningless.

    A fingerprint found on an object that had been in a public place is meaningless.

    Even a fingerprint found on an explosive device has the potential to be meaningless unless there is other evidence connecting a suspect to the crime. Why? Because components must be: manufactured, packaged, sold or may have changed hand numerous times.

    What the FBI should have done is looked to see if there was anything else that connected this guy to the crime except a print and the fact the man was Muslim. Then they should have double checked. Why? Because that is their job and prosecutions fall quite often on faulty evidence!

    I too see this ruling as a positive change.
     
  17. 2 Timothy2:1-4

    2 Timothy2:1-4
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,879
    Likes Received:
    0

    This particular ruling makes no effective change. It will continue to be battled in the courts until it gets to the Supreme Court.
     
  18. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by carpro
    Fingerprints at a crime scene are not "probable cause"?



    Really ?

    It's kinda tough when they are used as probable cause on a fairly routine basis to obtain search warrants.

    These prints weren't the defendants. That's the problem. Making this knnd of sweeping ruling based on an admitted mistake by the government will never stand.

    It turned out they did not have probable cause but believed they did at the time of the search. I believe this ruling will be applied only to this case and has no real effect on the Patriot Law.
     
  19. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,547
    Likes Received:
    212
    Don't know how else to say it. I haven't been able to find any other case where a fingerprint was used as probable cause.

    Why stop there? I saw you at the scene, so I'm going to put you under surveillance. Or, I heard you were at the scene, so I'm going to put you under surveillance.

    The Patriot Act is being misused.
     
  20. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Capro, I don't think so. Prints may be enough to pull someone in for questioning, but it's not going to be enough by itself to obtain a search warrant for their home/car/office/phones plus funding to follow the owner of the fingerprint everywhere he goes on the mere possiblity that he might do something incriminating. Especially a print recovered from a public surface (see my above post).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...