Pelosi: Amend the First Amendment

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by mandym, Apr 19, 2012.

  1. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-amend-first-amendment
     
  2. mandym

    mandym
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/citizens-united-founder-posse-radicals-want-overturn-first-amendment
     
  3. freeatlast

    freeatlast
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0

    Evil people with evil hearts vote in evil people with evil hearts and get what they deserve. The bible says it is reaping what we sow. The question is are we going to follow in her steps and vote in another evil administration that we think is less evil then the one we now have or keep the one we have now?
     
  4. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,124
    Likes Received:
    319
    Amend or rescind the First (Prima Facie:The Most Important and therefore all others following behind it are suspect) Amendment?

    Which is it?

    Soon we will all have the right to SHUT UP and make bricks without straw and then be taxed for making the bricks as well (aka:The Cap and Trade Tax).

    Wake up America - Nero is fidlin'.

    Four more years?

    HankD
     
    #4 HankD, Apr 20, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2012
  5. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,502
    Likes Received:
    40
    AMEN & AMEN!!
    Those who slept through the last election had better wake up this election - if we actually have an election - or this WILL be the last election!!!!!!
     
  6. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good for Pelosi! You all agree, don't you?
     
  7. freeatlast

    freeatlast
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is she good for Bill?
     
  8. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Democrats are idiots.
     
  9. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Some less so than others.

    Take the Blue Dog Democrats...

    Uh...has anyone seen any Blue Dog Dems?

    No?

    Obama must've eaten them.:smilewinkgrin:
     
  10. freeatlast

    freeatlast
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother [fn] will be liable to judgment; whoever insults [fn] his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell [fn] of fire.
     
  11. Alcott

    Alcott
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    7,454
    Likes Received:
    93
    "Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"
     
  12. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,539
    Likes Received:
    208
    When you single out any particular group -- corporations, unions, whites, blacks, whatever -- and tell them that simply because of their particular group, they don't have protections under the Constitution that everyone else does -- well, I'm not a constitutional law professor like Obama is, but I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the constitution.

    I know they're trying to limit corporations being able to have a political viewpoint, because corporations will typically back the candidate that's friendlier to business (and that ain't the Democrats); but trying to justify it as corporations have an unfair advantage because they have money...well, we might as well say that whites (or blacks, or whatever group you want to use as an example) shouldn't be allowed to contribute to political causes because they're a majority and have an unfair advantage over the minority(ies).
     
  13. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    >"Corporations as opposed to individuals"? How about unions also, "as opposed to individuals?"

    OK with me.
     
  14. LillyoftheValley

    LillyoftheValley
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone get the feeling that if this passes, the church could be next?
     
  15. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,124
    Likes Received:
    319
    Yes.

    HankD
     
  16. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Next for what? It is already illegal for a 501c3 to support a political candidate.
     
  17. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,124
    Likes Received:
    319
    "Hate Crimes" so-called.

    This is the first olive out of the bottle. It will trickle down to the individual.

    In fact, it already has, 50 million have been silenced from their mother's womb.

    HankD
     
  18. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,458
    Likes Received:
    136

Share This Page

Loading...