In another thread Brother Martin argued that it is wrong for us to “malign” Obama as a Marxist. To which I responded: Following that Brother Martin took exception with my first sentence quoted above regarding Obama’s Marxist relationships and responded with: Notice Brother Martin focused his refutation on only part of what I said above. He focused on Obama’s connections and associations and neglected to address Obama’s obviously Socialist political agenda. Now consider what Winston S. Churchill had to say about Socialism and its connection with Marxist ideals: Before we go any further those who oppose the idea of referring to Obama as a Socialist or Marxist must answer one question. How many Socialist or Marxist ideals and/or policies regarding government must one espouse and/or support before it is acceptable to refer to them as a Socialist or a Marxist as opposed to a Capitalist etc.?