1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Progressive Clergy of Georgia

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by John Wells, Aug 16, 2001.

  1. John Wells

    John Wells New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2001
    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Robert,

    Deut. 21:18-21 is a ficticious example of how the Levitical justice system should work. We're shown an example (suppose) of a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child who was incorrigibly disobedient. No hope remained for such a person who flagrantly violated the fifth commandment (Ex. 20:12), so in the example, he was to be stoned to death by the town leaders (governing body of the town). This was the equivalent of a legal trial with the authority to impose the death penalty. There is no indication that this actually happened but was used as a teaching example to illustrate the seriousness of sinning against God.

    Practicing homosexuals who unashamedly parade their sin in the face of God Almighty also fit "a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child (of God) who is incorrigibly disobedient." I'm not saying we are to stone them. God will mete out His perfect justice and judgment in due time. I would that all homosexuals turn from their wicked ways and be cleansed from all unrighteousness, that they may be called children of God and avoid His wrath!
     
  2. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wells,

    I can think of several "practicing homosexuals" in our congregation who do not fit "a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child (of God) who is incorrigibly disobedient." If you did not know their sexual orientation, you'd probably be eager to have them in your congregation.

    The fact of the matter is, the only difference is that the person whom they love is the same sex. That's all. No other differences.

    Joshua

    [ August 24, 2001: Message edited by: CJoshuaV ]
     
  3. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>I can think of several "oracticing homosexuals" in our congregation who do not fit "a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child (of God) who is incorrigibly disobedient." <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Can you not see the inherent contradiction in this statement? That is like saying that someone who constantly steals does not fit the pattern of a thief. They may not brag about it or flaunt it, but they are no less rebellious.

    For example, many has been the pastor who dallied in an affair on the side. The congregation did not know it (at least for a while) and were delighted to have them in their church. Once the sin became known, they were removed.

    Concerning homsexuals you said, " The fact of the matter is, the only difference is that the person whom they love is the same sex. That's all. No other differences."

    Concerning the adulterous pastor (or anyone else for that matter) I would say, "The only difference is that the person whom they love is not their wife. That's all. No other differences." Does that make it right? Does that justify it? I hardly think so.
     
  4. John Wells

    John Wells New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2001
    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    As an ordained minister, I'm sure you know the sum of what God says about same-sex relationships. By choice, you rationalize what you want to believe to suite the bent of your heart. But it flys in the face of God's heart as revealed by His Word. Several of us have witnessed to you concerning this. As a minister you have an added responsibility to not lead others astray by condoning their sin (Proverbs 10:17).

    Preach the Word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage--with great patience and careful instruction. For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. (2 Tim 4:2-4 NIV)
     
  5. Scottie

    Scottie Guest

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wellsjs:
    [QB]Robert,

    Deut. 21:18-21 is a ficticious example of how the Levitical justice system should work. We're shown an example (suppose) of a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child who was incorrigibly disobedient. No hope remained for such a person who flagrantly violated the fifth commandment (Ex. 20:12), so in the example, he was to be stoned to death by the town leaders (governing body of the town). This was the equivalent of a legal trial with the authority to impose the death penalty. There is no indication that this actually happened but was used as a teaching example to illustrate the seriousness of sinning against God.
    QB]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Wellsj,

    This is what non-fundamentalist mean when they say intellectual dis-honesty. The bible has no errors you claim, but then claim that important parts of it are fictional. Only teaching moments. "God didn't really mean all that stuff" LOL.

    Scott
     
  6. John Wells

    John Wells New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2001
    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Scottie,

    Are you saying that you have a problem seeing the difference between a parable or a statement that starts with "Suppose" and how these fit perfectly within the confines of God's inerrant Word? :confused:

    If everything the Bible said was agreeable with our hearts, then nobody would raise an issue about inerrancy. Does your disbelief in the inerrancy of the Bible have anything to do with a part of it that conflicts with your lifestyle or the desires of your own heart?
     
  7. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Larry,

    A person who commits adultery violates their vow to another person. A person who is in love with a person of the same sex does no such thing.

    Some hypotehesize that it violates some theorietical created order - which presumably the polygamy of the Old Testament did not violate.

    Joshua
     
  8. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by CJoshuaV:
    Larry,

    A person who commits adultery violates their vow to another person.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    True. However, it is the disobeying of God's Word that makes it sin. Some married couples willingly swap partners. If we apply your apparent rule, they have not committed sin since their spouse approved. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> A person who is in love with a person of the same sex does no such thing.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Again, if we accept man's opinion as the standard then you have a point. However, if we accept the clear standard of God then their violation is against Him.

    Also, whether accidental or purposeful, I notice that you use "in love with" as opposed to "loves." Perhaps I am nitpicking you but "in love with" implies a sense of helpless fatalism based on feelings to me (which is how the world views love). The implication of "loves" is that it is a act of will (which is what the Bible teaches.)

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> Some hypotehesize that it violates some theorietical created order - which presumably the polygamy of the Old Testament did not violate.

    Joshua
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    While I am not aware of a passage that clearly condemned the OT polygamists, it is nonetheless clear that trouble followed this practice. Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, and Solomon all experienced terrible consequences in their families. I cannot think of any examples where OT polygamy created a harmonious family nor do I know of any positive examples of homosexuality in the Bible. Both of these things violate God's standard for sex and marriage.
     
  9. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    So God did not want Jacob to marry Rachel and Leah (meaning God intended for there to be only 10 or only 2 tribes of Israel)? God did not want Tamar and Judah to have extramarital sex (leading, according to Matthew, ultimately to the birth of Jesus)?

    Joshua
     
  10. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by RobertLynn:



    Now, I'm a counselor and social worker. If I interpret this passage of scripture the way you have interpreted the passages you have listed here, then instead of counseling with families and working with kids to restore relationships, we should really just be taking them before the men in town and stoning them to death? Aside from working myself out of a job, something tells me that we're missing something in the interpretation of these passages of scripture.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Actually, homosexuals, adulterers, and other 'criminals' were stoned to death in the OT as well. OT Israel under the Mosaic law was a theocracy. Violation of moral laws was subject to civil justice.

    These immediate and severe acts of justice lost the approval of God when Christ died, fulfilling the law and making a way for salvation by grace. Judgment is now reserved for those who refuse Christ as their substitution. In no way did Christ over turn the moral laws of the OT. Homosexuality, adultery, and child disobedience are still sins with a price- either one already paid or one to be paid for eternity.
     
  11. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by CJoshuaV:
    So God did not want Jacob to marry Rachel and Leah (meaning God intended for there to be only 10 or only 2 tribes of Israel)? God did not want Tamar and Judah to have extramarital sex (leading, according to Matthew, ultimately to the birth of Jesus)?

    Joshua
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I cannot say what God's perfect will might have been and will not speculate. However, there are numerous of examples throughout the Bible of God achieving His ultimate will through the evil acts of man. The deliverance of Israel by Joseph's slavery comes immediately to mind...Pharoah's hardened heart, Judas' betrayal, Peter's denial, Peter's sinking, etc.
     
  12. Rev. Joshua

    Rev. Joshua <img src=/cjv.jpg>

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    So God has enough control over humanity to bring about God's will, but not enough to bring it about in a way that doesn't involve violating God's commandments?

    Joshua
     
  13. RobertLynn

    RobertLynn New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2001
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wellsjs:
    Robert,

    Deut. 21:18-21 is a ficticious example of how the Levitical justice system should work. We're shown an example (suppose) of a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child who was incorrigibly disobedient. No hope remained for such a person who flagrantly violated the fifth commandment (Ex. 20:12), so in the example, he was to be stoned to death by the town leaders (governing body of the town). This was the equivalent of a legal trial with the authority to impose the death penalty. There is no indication that this actually happened but was used as a teaching example to illustrate the seriousness of sinning against God.

    Practicing homosexuals who unashamedly parade their sin in the face of God Almighty also fit "a pattern of rebellion and sin of a child (of God) who is incorrigibly disobedient." I'm not saying we are to stone them. God will mete out His perfect justice and judgment in due time. I would that all homosexuals turn from their wicked ways and be cleansed from all unrighteousness, that they may be called children of God and avoid His wrath!
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Well, how interesting. And convenient. Deutrononomy 21:18-21 is fictitious. But your prooftext from Leviticus isn't.

    I think the children in Israel who were stoned by their parents under the law would probably not agree.
     
  14. John Wells

    John Wells New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2001
    Messages:
    2,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    RobertLynn,

    If you will look back, it was Joshua who asked me to comment about the text in question, which starts with, "Suppose . . ." It is a hypothetical situation. I responded as such. Now is there anything else you want to nit-pick to death?

    [ August 24, 2001: Message edited by: wellsjs ]
     
Loading...