Proposal to arm the slaves by Maj. Gen. Patrick Cleburne, CSA

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by carpro, Sep 16, 2014.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/primarysources/patrick-r-cleburne-et-al.html


    Patrick Cleburne's Proposal to Arm Slaves
    JANUARY 2, 1864


     
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Would the war have turned out differently if his controversial advice had been taken? It might have turned history on it's ear.
     
  3. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    155
    My guess is that lots of slave owners would have met an early death had their slaves been armed. We will never know, we can only speculate. I am more sure that lots of overseers and patty rollers would have met an early death.
     
  4. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,069
    Likes Received:
    216
    For masters that were brutal - that may be true.
    but for masters that worked in the fields with his slaves - different story?
     
  5. Jerome

    Jerome
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    44
    Why would it be?

    Brutality is brutality, whether a hands-on master in the fields brutalizes you himself, or hires an overseer to do so.
     
  6. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,069
    Likes Received:
    216

    Evidently you have no ideal what I am talking about
     
  7. Jerome

    Jerome
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    44
    You're presenting a false dichotomy: brutal masters and 'masters that worked in the fields with his [sic] slaves'.
     
  8. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,069
    Likes Received:
    216
    Lets see if I understand your correctly?

    You believer that ALL slave owners were brutal to their slaves?
     
  9. Jerome

    Jerome
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    44
    I'm saying you're presenting a false dichotomy: brutal masters and 'masters that worked in the fields with his [sic] slaves'.

    Were you intending to contrast brutal masters and non-brutal masters?
     
    #9 Jerome, Oct 8, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 8, 2014
  10. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,069
    Likes Received:
    216
    If you don't want to answer my question, than I suppose the conversation is over.
     
  11. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,609
    Likes Received:
    155
    For sake of clarity let's say brutal versus non-brutal. There is probably some truth in your statement. We will never know for sure.

    I am not sure what behavior would be recognized as non-brutal. The slave holders who were rich enough to have overseers might have been in danger even if they were not brutal as often, at least from my readings, the overseers were the really bad guys.

    For those who owned one or two slaves, they had to work alongside their slaves. I expect they were not brutal as they had so much of their resources invested in the one or two slaves it was in their, the owners, best interest to treat them well and keep them healthy.

    I wonder if anyone has conducted a Ph.D. study on the treatment of slaves by various sized farms and plantations?

    Regardless, IMHO, slavery was a completely indefensible institution in our history.
     

Share This Page

Loading...