Quaditarians

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Craigbythesea, Aug 15, 2004.

  1. Craigbythesea

    Craigbythesea
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    20
    Only God is infallible. Therefore, those individuals that are of the sect that teaches that the KJV is infallible are teaching that the KJV is God. So are KJOists quaditarians, or do they believe that “The King James Bible” is the name of the father, the son, and the Holy Spirit?
     
  2. Slambo

    Slambo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gee Craig,going off the deep end are we??

    I have never heard anybody say that!!!!!!


    You really need a break!!!!!!
     
  3. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've met many KJV-onlyists who elevate the KJV higher than God, through a faulty interpretation of Psalm 138:2.
     
  4. Slambo

    Slambo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    natters said:I've met many KJV-onlyists who elevate the KJV higher than God, through a faulty interpretation of Psalm 138:2.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    How so???

    The word mentioned in that Psalm is not the same Word in John 1...

    "Falty interpetation?"

    Uh......Yeah!!!! :rolleyes:
     
  5. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm glad you agree, Slambo. [​IMG]
     
  6. Slambo

    Slambo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think you understand though.

    The references I gave are NOT the same.It is evedent that God places His word(written)over His name.The Word mentioned in John 1 is the Lord Jesus Christ...How can you mix that up??

    Oh I forget,you don't have a Bible that tells you to "study" it;better get a KJV!!!
     
  7. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slambo said "How can you mix that up??"

    I didn't mix anything up. I made no mention of John 1:1 one way or the other. I was not explaining my own belief, but the belief of some KJV-onlyists I have met.

    Please explain what "over his name" means. Are you saying something strange like the KJV is above God but below Jesus? Please explain what "thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name" means to you.
     
  8. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who are KJV-onylists? Do you believe ALL KJV-Onlyists are in ONE camp?
     
  9. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    Askjo said "Who are KJV-onylists?"

    People that believe only the KJV is inerrant, perfect, "the word of God", etc. in English (although some extend this to include other languages as well).

    Askjo said "Do you believe ALL KJV-Onlyists are in ONE camp?"

    One general camp, but they sleep in different tents. [​IMG]
     
  10. Major B

    Major B
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/6069.jpg>

    Joined:
    May 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Obviously the quaditarianists are "four point" KJVOs, as opposed to "three point." Or, is this from another argument?
     
  11. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Think the extreme position of the thread shows that the KJVo sect is NOT monolithic and we should be carefully attributing ALL the absurdity of this view to every one who claims the moniker.

    The problem stems, of course, from the lack of doctrinal basis for ANY KJVo position. So when someone esponses an extreme view (as this thread) there is no solid recourse in fact to refute it.

    So it is with all sects and false teaching . .
     
  12. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong! If they disagree each other in ONE camp, will they walk together?
     
  13. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ruckmanites? Gippites? Riplingerites? Waiteites? Cloudites? Which do you talk about?
     
  14. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    Askjo said "Wrong! If they disagree each other in ONE camp, will they walk together?"

    Sometimes they even walk into each other.

    Askjo said "Ruckmanites? Gippites? Riplingerites? Waiteites? Cloudites? Which do you talk about?"

    I'm talking about people that believe only the KJV is inerrant, perfect, "the word of God", etc. in English (although some extend this to include other languages as well). That would include all those you mentioned, although I would not use those terms myself.
     

Share This Page

Loading...