1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Question: 27 books...

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by PeterMeansRock, Dec 14, 2005.

  1. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Yeah - they must have been pretty confused for about 300 years 'cause all they had was Paul and Peter to keep them straight on which letters were legit. No actual "Pope" to guide them.

    Never thought of that one! [​IMG]

    I "love" this topic as you can tell.
     
  2. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    So we may be missing crucial teachings?
    What if we have included erroneous teachings?
    Do we have no way of knowing?

    So we know that Paul's writings are scriptural, and probably Peters. What about Matthew, Mark, Luke and John? Especially Mark and Luke who weren't apostles? And like the OP said, why Philemon? It's like half a page long.

    I've heard it put thusly: How could they?
    The first Christians couldn't have relied on the bible only -
    1)Books were VERY expensive, costing years of wages to purchase
    2)Books were hard to care for - that massive purchase might last only a generation or so in a non-weather-tight house
    3)Being very expensive and hard to care for, books were very hard to find.
    4)Books in your language were even harder, often.
    5)Even if you could find and purchase and keep a book in your language, you were still probably couldn't read it because you - like 98% of the rest of society - were probably illiterate.


    Then, of course, there is the aforementioned issue about not having a definite list of books.

    There were a ton of early writings. Many claimed to be inspired but weren't.

    How did God let us know what books belonged and which books didn't?

    Other leters had wide-spread acceptance. Letters by bishops like Ignatius of Antioch (who was a diciple of St. John and appointed Bishop by St. Peter) were considered by many to be scripture. Others considered books like Revelation emphatically NOT scripture.

    How do you decide who makes the call? Or do we all get to build our own bibles?

    Genuinely written by Paul, and inspired by the holy spirit, are two entirely seperate issues. Not all of Paul's letters are in the NT.

    Which churches? Source?

    But did they have the authority to do that? Sorry, this is all so new to me I don't know what to think. How do we know that they had such authority to decide what was and wasn't canonical?

    Why believe some Catholic bishop?

    So it's not scripture vs. tradition, but rather scripture IS tradition!?

    Could the wrong books have been included?

    Incidentally, Athanasius included the Apocrapha/Deuterocanonicals...so...should those be accepted too?

    I've heard that it was actually the Council of Rome in 382 that first decided that.

    How "Catholic" is "catholic"?

    Did they have the same sacrements? Did they have Priests and Bishops and deacons? Did they believe what Catholis believe today or did they believe other things?

    Probably because most of them couldn't read. Was some stuff passed on that wasn't written down? Or is everything we need in the scriptures - and how do we know that it is?

    Indeed, how do you know?
     
  3. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, that was really long...sorry...
     
  4. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Be careful, man. I know of some in this board who will jump right in and question your salvation, just like KJVO'S tend to question the salvation of those who do not use KJV only, as if one's salvation depended on one's belief that all scriptures of today are God-breathed and declared to be so by the Bible itself.
     
  5. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    By the way, this forum is close to its third page and we have yet to read another post from the OP. Why so ?
     
  6. riverm

    riverm New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    1
    The OP was banned...
     
  7. riverm

    riverm New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    1
    Be careful, man. I know of some in this board who will jump right in and question your salvation, just like KJVO'S tend to question the salvation of those who do not use KJV only, as if one's salvation depended on one's belief that all scriptures of today are God-breathed and declared to be so by the Bible itself. </font>[/QUOTE]I was raised an IFB, I’m now considering Methodist and have been studying Wesleyan Theology.

    My parents are IFB and KJVO, but I have never been KJVO. My parents actually believe that God has preserved the KJV and if you ain’t a IFB, you’re probably lost. They already believe that I’m a lost sinner for leaving the Baptist denomination. To them there’s no salvation outside the Baptist church. Unfortunately, that kind of attitude that has left a bad taste in my mouth in regard to the Baptist faith.

    I know not ALL Baptist are like that, but the majority I have experienced do have an holier than thou attitude.

    Blessings
     
  8. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    what's an IFB? I_____ Fundamentalist Baptist?
     
  9. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, they weren't, not in the sense that we use "Catholic" today as a reference to Roman Catholicism.
     
  10. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Was there a pope then? Did the Bishop of Rome have any kind of authority?
     
  11. riverm

    riverm New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    1
    Independent Fundamentalist Baptist

    They’re separated and are really a “non-denominational” church, only they adhere to the Baptist distinctives, so they take on the name “Baptist”.
     
  12. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's contradictory. Being that they adhere to the Baptist distinctives, they are Baptist by denomination. They are not apart of a convention, which is what "independent" addresses. They are, like the churches of the NT, autonomous.
     
  13. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I realise I don't moderate this forum, but what does IFB have to do with "27 books?"
     
  14. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    None of God's Word has been "lost". The reason we have 27 books in the New Testament is because God had it planned that way through the early writers and churches. God would not allow His Word to get lost. Maybe there are letters not inspired by God, though, that were lost.
     
  15. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Were the NT churches autonomous?

    They had "overseers" or "bishops". And in Acts 15, we even see a church council of a sorts in Jerusalem which was binding wasn't it?

    What's the purpose of having bishops?
     
  16. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    How do we know he wanted us to have any books? And this still doesn't seem to account for how we know 27 books are correct and non are erroneous or lacking.

    Does the bible say "I'll compose a book of 27 letters - keep an eye peeled for it,"? Does it say "the following books are inspired?" or even "the early church will decide which books you should read,"

    And what happened to that early church, also?
     
  17. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Because we have them, that's how.

    This might be your view, but it's not God's view.
    2Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness,
    In so many words... All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness,
    Who cares?
     
  18. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    But how do you know you're supposed to have those 27 books?

    But how do you know WHICH books are scripture?

    But where does it say WHICH books are scripture? I agree that what is scripture is, by definition " inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for rebuking, for correcting, for training in righteousness,", but that doesn't answer my question.

    I do.

    Well, Jesus said he was founding a church, and we can see that church in action. Jesus didn't say "write this in memory of me" but "do this in memory of me". He gave commands for actoins and gave to some men authority...what happened to them? What happened to this visible institution founded by the Son of God?
     
  19. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    How do you know that Peter, James, Paul, John etc all left the NT saints "in the dark" about those letters?

    The "27" were all finished by the death of John. Remember?

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  20. NarnianSoldier

    NarnianSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    But by 100 AD there was not clear consensus on what books comprised the NT, was there?
     
Loading...