Question for pastors and seminarians

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by quantumfaith, Jun 30, 2014.

  1. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Reformed

    Reformed
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,227
    Likes Received:
    57
    The Wiki article is basically correct. Except for the Antilogomena (cannonicity of some books that were disputed) there was a functioning cannon by early 3rd century. A good resource document is Early Christian Doctrines by J.N.D. Kelly. Kelly does a good job of explaining the formation of the New Testament cannon.
     
  3. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for input. Where (what was the source) of this functioning canon in the third century? Was it simply some sort of consensus?
     
  4. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Regardless if it is correct or not -- and quite frankly, given it is Wikipedia, I'd be amazed if it actually is -- I wouldn't use this absurd excuse for an online encyclopedia for anything. If I found someone had printed it out and it was the only source of paper in the house, I wouldn't even use it for bathroom tissue.
     
  5. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    11
    I'd agree, and add that while we have evidence that most of the canon was in general agreement by the end of the 2nd century and the "functioning canon" by mid 3rd, that merely sets a limit on the latest those events could have occurred. Given the vagaries of historic preservation over 18+ centuries, the actual assemblage was almost certainly earlier; we just don't have evidence - yet - of earlier dates.
     
  6. Reformed

    Reformed
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,227
    Likes Received:
    57
    There are writings from the patristic fathers* that quote from substantially most of what is now the NT canon. Marcion and Tertullian are most notable among them. Marcion assembled a functioning canon that that contained a majority of the books that make up our canon. This was done in the in the AD 140's (mid-2nd century).

    *keep in mind that the patristic fathers were a mixed bag. Marcion was a rank heretic, although his work on the canon has proven useful from a historical perspective.
     
  7. Brandon C. Jones

    Brandon C. Jones
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Quantum,

    For the most part the article gives a helpful summary of the development of both biblical canons and their remaining differences among Christian traditions today.

    If you're interested in the development of the canon, the most helpful book I've come across is Lee Martin McDonald's The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority. Another study that is much briefer and only focuses on the development of the NT canon is Craig D. Allert's A High View of Scripture?
     
  8. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks Brandon, I will check out your suggestion after I complete the following:

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/0310331366/?tag=baptis04-20

    I really enjoy and appreciate the counterpoints offerings.
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,114
    Likes Received:
    52
    wasn't the OT canon though a;ready decided by the time of jesus, as the jewish people had a canon that was what we as baptists see as being the OT?

    They refused to accept as inspired scripture any of the so called Deutocanoncial/Apocrapha books?

    And wasn't it also the truth that all but belive 4 books werer already being passed around and being read/used to establish NT truths, so by beginning of the second century already pretty much the canon established, just formally ratified later on?
     

Share This Page

Loading...