This is a question for those who believe the King James Version (yr ?) is the only correct english translation of the Bible. How do you, from Scripture alone, support your claims? Let me clearify what I am looking for here. I am not looking for a comparison between the KJV and other "modern" english translations. Such a comparison is faulty because it starts with the presupposition that the KJV is the only correct english translation. Thus such an argument is circular. I am not looking for someone to tell me that it is the "authorized version" since, historically, that has nothing to do with the claimed superior nature of the translation. I am not looking for a debate about the various text types from which the KJV vs. modern texts are taken. Such a debate is not within the scope of KJV onlyism since some "modern" translations use basically the same text (including new manuscript finds since 1611). I am not looking for spurious arguments about how everyone who translated the NIV was "evil" or how the NKJV translators are out to "fool people with their false perversion of the KJV text". Such arguments are wrong because many of the textual scholars who worked on these translations are Godly Christians who, like Martin Luther, wanted a English Bible in the modern language. What I am looking for is solid, textual reasons for the claim that the KVJ is superior to all other English translations. What does that mean? That means that I am looking for a solid, Biblical (only) arugment for KVJ onlyism. I am not so much looking for "chapter and verse", since that would clearly be impossible. What I am looking for is a solid defense of the KJV only position. Martin.