Questions fundamentalists ought to answer

Let me see if I understand this correctly: In my limited knowledge of masonry, they basically accept all religions, and condemn none.

But a group that says we accept your religion, no matter what beliefs you have (including IFB, pentecostal, mormon, and muslim), and basically teaches its members to accept all other members regardless of their religious beliefs...is "much less" wicked and dangerous than "backwards fundamentalism," which preaches that you should only use the Christian bible and you should only accept Jesus as lord and savior?

Are you a mason? Because that's the only reason I can think of why'd you defend it.

 

Then you have not heeded your own commandment to "educate" yourself. It is without question another gospel and has NO place in the Christian church! It is a cult!

 

As long as you realise that it would seem that ONLY a moinority of fundamental baptists subscribed to those errors that you and I both agreed upon, why attack entire movement, not refute smaller vocal minority within it?

 

Shutting down another inflammatory thread