1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

RCC Priest says Jesus may have been married

Discussion in 'Free-For-All Archives' started by Briguy, Nov 5, 2003.

  1. thessalonian

    thessalonian New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brian,

    Not cranky at all. It just "offends" you that I proclaim boldy what I believe because it is true. Not because I have discovered it myself in the pages of the Bible (though I have in a secondary sense), for if I had "discovered" otherwise it would still be true. No it is not my discovery that has placed me in his truth but his grace and mercy which he wishes for you also. And so I must proclaim boldly rather than water it down with realativism.

    It would behove you to get yourself a copy of the Jurgen's "Faith of our Fathers" and read through it and find out how uneduactated you are in this idea of the Early Church being so disjointed. (though not understanding Catholicism you may not pick up on how Catholic these guys really were anyway). When I read Augustine in Africa and Ignatius in Antioch and Clement in Rome and John Chrystrom in Constantiople and many othersand there are elements of all of them that are distinctly Catholic, while I find nothing in them contradictory to Catholicism, I think Irenaus was right about the great unity in the Church at that time. On issues such as the real prescence in the Eucharist, Baptismal Regeneration, and the Perpetual virginity of Mary among many other you can quote dozens who believed it throughout the world while those who don't you can even cover half of five fingers. Even on the issue of the Papacy, nowhere can you find the Petros arguement that Protestants like to use even among the heretics, most of whom look to Rome to resolve the issues they have also. It was far greater than the unity that exists now after the reforamtion. Disunity is not of God no matter how many protestant pastors have told me so (and they have). It is actually an icredible act of the spirit of God working through sacred Oral tradition that in spite of the miles between them the held "fast to the traditions that" they "had recieved, whether by WORD OF MOUTH or in writing from us". When we are supposed to "worship in spirit and truth" you say we can never know the truth. You say I am once saved always saved, yet you cannot even know that your interprutation that causes you to be OSAS is true. Therefore you are only OSAS if your interprutation is correct. You are no more sure of your salvation than the man on the moon by your system of salvatoin because you are not sure that that system is infallibly correct. If your OSAS doctrine is false it is worse than neutral, for it leads you astray. Only that your fallible interprutatoin of the scriptures has deemed it so.

    Sorry got sidetracked.

    Don't take the boldness of my posts as a dislike or crankieness of you Brian. I am quite certain that in person we would be quite good friends. [​IMG]

    Blessings
     
  2. GraceSaves

    GraceSaves New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    0
    I get the distinction, but I don't think that difficulties between brothers is something that would worry the universal Church either, for these things CAN be settled in a local manner. I don't see how this voids the possibility of a real live universal authority over the faith and morals of Christians, something that SHOULDN'T be different.

    Thanks for checking up on me. [​IMG] I appreciate it. This semester is finally coming to a close (just wrote a research paper last night...yuck), but its going well. I'm still a good 7.5 years away from ordination, God willing. [​IMG]
     
  3. Briguy

    Briguy <img src =/briguy.gif>

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Gerald, Thanks for the post and you are probably right that we would be friends in real life because we have Christ in common. Believe it or not I do understand your "authority" argument. Sometimes when I see different ways to view a scripture (like in John 3, the word water) I wish I had a certain place I could go to get a definite answer. On the other hand, I fear that I would cheat myself and go to the authority without giving the verse or matter at hand my own prayer and study. I see a great benefit to both ways. You commented on the early writings and beliefs of early Christians. I have a issue with how accurate the writings are and how accurate the teachings may have been in those early days of the "Body of Christ". I mention this alot but look at the "church" in Corinth. They had serious issues in less then 20 years and every local church mentioned in Revelations has a problem. If doctrinal issues could have been in question in the first 50 years why do we think it was straightened out after that without more problems. Error in teaching of Jesus is the Devils big thing. It is his focus. We have the Bible to draw our answers from, the best we can. Men, as proven by Christians in Corinth who were cursing Jesus, are fallible in every sense of the word.

    All for now,
    In Christ,
    Brian
     
  4. Briguy

    Briguy <img src =/briguy.gif>

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey Grant, 7.5 years yet? Wow, that is a lot of study. Some of that is interning, isn't it?

    As I said to Thess. above I see good and bad with the authority thing. We see the coruption of the Church of England in our US history. That is why we have a US constitution to avoid the corrutness that happens when Men have Power. That is why there have been bad Popes and probably every other position down to priest, because many people cannot handle the power of having authority. You may say God has the authority but He doesn't when men get prideful and go their own way instead. I think God knew this, as He knows everything, and so set up local assemblies. Each assembly had Shepherds and Jesus was the head Sheperd. For example

    God/Jesus
    Shepherd Shepherd
    Local church Local church


    God/Jesus
    Pope
    Cardinals
    Bishops
    Shepherds Shepherds
    Local church Local church

    I know I missed some on the CC example but the point in there is much more room for error in the CC model, and that is my point.

    Bye for now, May God bless your day,
    Brian
     
  5. GraceSaves

    GraceSaves New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brian,

    While I appreciate your honesty (VERY MUCH SO!), I don't see how your last argument works. With their being a local shepard only, that means (other than God), there is no one to keep him in line, to check on his work and repremand if necessary. You could argue that the assembly has this power, but what if the assembly does nothing, or the majority are in agreement with this shepard who may have gone astray?

    Do to the lack of checks and balances, I can see (and have witnessed in local assemblies back at my small home town in AR) pastors who are obviously power hungry. I see it as an unavoidable consequence of positions with responsibility. Can the pope become corrupted? Absolutely, and we've seen it happen (although these corrupt men, by virtue of their office, could not teach error by prevention of the Holy Spirit, in spite of themselves). However, there is no valid argument that states that the leader of a local assembly cannot and will not suffer the same fate.
     
  6. Briguy

    Briguy <img src =/briguy.gif>

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi Grant, I think you kind of answered your own question. In a proper assembly, the pastors are held accoutable by the Board(elders and deacons). Also a proper assembly will have a church constitution that can only be changed by the vote of the entire membership. That of course holds accountability to both the pastors and board. The pastor we had before our current one was not fulfilling everything required of him and our board worked with him for a period of time and it did not help so they basically asked him to resign. There is always a chance that some pastors or elders will take advantage of the power they have. In our church I sometimes feel a lack of communication. For instance we are moving in about 1.5 years and we just spent a bunch of money on new carpet in our entrance way. The previous carpet was only a few years old. I didn't agree with that decision and wish I had a chance to vote on it, but alas I submit to leadership and trust them. Doctrinally it takes a full memebership vote to change something and so there is not swaying with the wind as pastors come and go. Done biblically local assemblies will run fine, as long as thet don't waver from what they know is right. Hope that helps explain my positon. As for the honesty in my statements I always try to let those on the BB that make good points know that they have me thinking. I totally see the benefit having a Man or group of men on earth that I can go to to have my concerns and questions answered, ultimate authority on earth sounds great to me, I can't see how someone would argue that. I just have not seen the possibility that it works that way in scripture so I keep to the local assembly model, which works at my church.

    In Christian love,
    Brian
     
  7. thessalonian

    thessalonian New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excuse me for butting in but the local assembly model is not contrary to the Catholic teaching as the local Church must run it's own internal affairs such as the color of the carpet. We don't wait for the Pope to tell us what kind of carpet to lay and which brand. I haven't noticed any national contracts for installing carpet from home depot in all the Churches [​IMG]

    The local Protestant radio station says that 25% of the pastors every couple of years are thrown out so it seems the Protestant system doesn't work too much with the pastor unless they like him. Can't remember the exact number but it's something like 30,000 pastors have left the ministery in the last ten years because the pressure is so high. I know of one instance where the guy wasn't a bad guy at all and they threw him out because he wanted to focus more on the OT than they had in the past. Here is the problem that I find with your local Church only system.

    "Doctrinally it takes a full memebership vote to change something and so there is not swaying with the wind as pastors come and go. "

    Perhaps you could find me a verse that says there was a vote by a local Church on doctrine in the Bible? (you may think Acts 15 but it won't get ya there bud. It wasn't local though there may have been a vote on what James proposed about eating meat sacrifiece to idols. [​IMG] )
    Now the Apostles as a whole were given the power to bind and loose (matt 18) and passed this on to their successors. While you may say this is not stated in the Bible that they had successors (something I disagree with) there is even less reason to believe from the Bible that the local Church should vote on doctrine from scripture. Get me the verse or three.


    I'm going to put smiley's and wavey's in so you don't think I'm cranky. I almost never am when I write to you or anyone else on this board. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] :D

    Blessings

    Gerald
     
Loading...