Reasons to Leave My NASB95

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by TCGreek, Jan 20, 2008.

  1. TCGreek

    TCGreek
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. I've been looking for reasons to part ways with my beloved NASU as my primary Bible, but I haven't found any. Does anyone know of any good reason?

    2. Some say it is too wooden. I found this to be an overstatement. While the NASU doesn't read as smooth as the NIV, it still reads well.

    3. Others say it needs to reflect more contemporary language, esp. in the gender area. Again, this is an overstatement, but I believe the translators, while employing some gender sensitive renditions, they could have done more on with the 1995 update.

    Since "bondservant" is somewhat archaic, they could have used "slaves" instead.
     
    #1 TCGreek, Jan 20, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 20, 2008
  2. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,404
    Likes Received:
    328
    Are you having separation anxiety TCG ? You needn't feel any guilt in making the HCSB your primary Bible . You will not be rejecting the NASU , you can still keep it close at hand . It just has to move over some so that the HCSB and NLTse can be front and center now . The NASU is a reliable version , but it's not the be-all and end-all .

    So go ahead and reposition your versions -- I give you my permission . It's okay . Now that wasn't so bad , was it ?
     
  3. PastorSBC1303

    PastorSBC1303
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    15,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you got to go looking for reasons, is it worth it?
     
  4. TCGreek

    TCGreek
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not that I'm looking for reasons, but I don't think I can ignore the latest biblical scholarship.
     
  5. TCGreek

    TCGreek
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rippon,

    I really like the HCSB, but as you know, I have my hangups. But I can't see myself parting ways with the NASU right now.

    I'm interested in the HCSB updated version, coming out next year.
     
  6. Deacon

    Deacon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6,970
    Likes Received:
    128
    Perhaps in response to my recent purchase and study of the New Living Translation, I’ve temporarily switched my preferred bible (on my computer) back to the NASB.

    Anyway, I'll still play your game. :laugh:

    1. Familiarity breeds contentment; changing versions every once in a while allows one to hear things with a different ear.

    2. NASB adheres quite vigorously to the critical text; recent eclectic scholars have moderated it’s use.

    3. The NASU’s “wooden” language is related to literalness, this can be a good thing or a bad thing. On the negative side, this means it sometimes includes words that sometimes are best left alone (e.g. double negatives).

    Rob
     
  7. mcdirector

    mcdirector
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,292
    Likes Received:
    10
    WHY? You seem to really want to part with a really good Bible! Why?

    It's madness! Madness!

    Just come to grips with the fact that you have a great Bible in your hands and use it! Put all this energy into something else!

    :D
     
  8. TaterTot

    TaterTot
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Dont leave it! If ya need to be talked into it, then maybe ya really dont.
     
  9. hawg_427

    hawg_427
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    0
    I still use my NASB updated version as my primary but I use my Cambridge KJV a close second. I don't like the NIV much even though my Church uses it as the primary text. I guess that's why there are many versions, many different tastes.
     
  10. The Scribe

    The Scribe
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with you. Put it down and buy a KJV. :thumbs:

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,404
    Likes Received:
    328
     
  12. The Scribe

    The Scribe
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Shame on you! :saint:
     
  13. Linda64

    Linda64
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    :thumbs: Right on!
     
  14. The Scribe

    The Scribe
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
    :wavey: :godisgood:
     
  15. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    And read it daily. :thumbs:
     
  16. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  17. The Scribe

    The Scribe
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I didn't. Shame on you too!
     
  18. Linda64

    Linda64
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wondered when you would catch that misquote!!:laugh: Somebody was not using the "quote" function properly! That was a quote from Rippon.
     
  19. standingfirminChrist

    standingfirminChrist
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    0
    It appears you have put it down enough. Maybe you should pick it up. Oh,... and read it.
     
    #19 standingfirminChrist, Jan 21, 2008
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2008
  20. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    2 Timothy 3:16-17 (Geneva Bible, 1599 Edition):
    For the whole Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God,
    and is profitable to teache, to conuince,
    to correct, and to instruct in righteousnesse,
    17 That the man of God may be absolute,
    being made perfect vnto all good workes.


    2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV1611 Edition):
    All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God,
    & is profitable for doctrine, for reproofe,
    for correction, for instrution in righteousnesse,
    17 That the man of God may be perfect,
    throughly furnished vnto all good workes.


    I think the Geneva Bible is better here
    for the 21st Century.
    'Perfect' can be (and frequently is)
    confused as meaning 'without sin'
    when it means 'complete''.
    'Absolute' is easier to see as meaning 'complete'.


    Personally I just started reading the NASB(1995).
    So I'll read it this year, 2008.
     

Share This Page

Loading...