1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Redskin's Trademark Cancelled

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Bro. Curtis, Jun 18, 2014.

  1. InTheLight

    InTheLight Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    24,988
    Likes Received:
    2,268
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm starting to screen print Redskins tee-shirts, caps, jackets, coffee mugs, key-fobs, etc. The trademark has been canceled meaning anyone can use it for financial gain. It's no longer protected. Yee-Haw!
     
  2. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Or the Notre Dame Irish Drunks?
     
  3. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'd like to change my screen name to Joe Gibbs.
     
  4. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's actually the Senate Democrats. Fifty of them. And I'm guessing Obama is the guy who the federal patent office has to answer to. So Rush wouldn't be far off, would he ?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...7e1a4c-e1f1-11e3-810f-764fe508b82d_story.html
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    For Immediate Release
    June 18, 2014

    STATEMENT BY BOB RASKOPF, TRADEMARK ATTORNEY
    FOR THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS

    LOUDOUN COUNTY, Va. – The following is a statement by Bob Raskopf, trademark attorney for the
    Washington Redskins, regarding today’s split decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:

    “We’ve seen this story before. And just like last time, today’s ruling will have no effect at all on the team’s
    ownership of and right to use the Redskins name and logo.
    ‘Redskins Are Denied Trademarks’
    -Washington Post, April 3, 1999

    ‘Redskins Can Keep Trademark, Judge Rules’
    -Washington Post, October 2, 2003
    We are confident we will prevail once again, and that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s divided ruling
    will be overturned on appeal. This case is no different than an earlier case, where the Board cancelled the
    Redskins’ trademark registrations, and where a federal district court disagreed and reversed the Board.
    As today’s dissenting opinion correctly states, “the same evidence previously found insufficient to support
    cancellation” here “remains insufficient” and does not support cancellation.
    This ruling – which of course we will appeal – simply addresses the team’s federal trademark registrations, and
    the team will continue to own and be able to protect its marks without the registrations. The registrations will
    remain effective while the case is on appeal.

    When the case first arose more than 20 years ago, a federal judge in the District of Columbia ruled on appeal in
    favor of the Washington Redskins and their trademark registrations.

    Why?

    As the district court’s ruling made clear in 2003, the evidence ‘is insufficient to conclude that during the
    relevant time periods the trademark at issue disparaged Native Americans…’ The court continued, ‘The Court
    concludes that the [Board’s] finding that the marks at issue ‘may disparage’ Native Americans is unsupported
    by substantial evidence, is logically flawed, and fails to apply the correct legal standard to its own findings of
    fact.’ Those aren’t my words. That was the court’s conclusion. We are confident that when a district court
    review’s today’s split decision, it will reach a similar conclusion.


    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/06...ng-with-obama-reid-in-trademark-ruling-126231
     
  6. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,485
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Possible New Names to honor of those trying to make them change their name:

    The Washington Sharks
    The Washington Politicians
    The Washington Scoundrels
    The Washington Swindlers
    The Washington Pirates (I know…)
    The Washington Electorate
    The Washington Patent-Pendings

    Rob
     
  7. Zaac

    Zaac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    222
    Yep, he'd be waaaaaaaaaay off. ANd not to mention that as the folks in the Redskins organization said, they expect this to get reversed just as it did the last time for the same reasons.

    So there's no need for them to move anywhere or rename anything.
     
  8. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I haven't heard anyone say it, but I disagree with you that he'd be waaaaay off.

    I agree they should not budge.
     
  9. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Leave it to a liberal to disparage the image that was inspired by the profile of Crazy Horse, one of the greatest Native American leaders in history. You probably prefer your Native Americans in a white man's suit and tie, sitting in IBM's corporate corner office with a Harvard Business degree on the wall. :rolleyes:

    Not that it doesn't happen, nor that it shouldn't. But is that really their heritage? Is that how Native Americans, Hispanics, blacks, Asians want to be seen?

    Homogenized, pasteurized, and "white-breaded"?

    I wonder if Native Americans think Crazy Horse's image is "derogatory"??

    I'd think not.
     
  10. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    More likely so that they can sue these teams who insult and injure them. A quick settlement might get you a million. :thumbsup:
     
  11. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Redskins should sue. It'd doubtful the patent office has the right to change the standards for discrimination without making their case in court.
     
  12. InTheLight

    InTheLight Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    24,988
    Likes Received:
    2,268
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oooh, let me try:

    The Washington Kickbacks
    The Washington Pork Barrels
    The Washington Graft
    The Washington Bureaucrats
    The Washington Interns
    The Washington Gridlock
    The Washington Deficits
    The Washington PACs
     
  13. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How about:

    The Washington InTheLights
     
  14. Zaac

    Zaac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    222
    [​IMG] Don't do it ITL.
     
  15. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You for got both the Washington Bureaucrats and the Washington Pointy-Heads. Or maybe the Red Tape.
     
  16. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    I vote with Snyder ...

    "There is no way we're changing the name ... "
     
  17. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    171
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was noted in another forum that this decision might lead to a much wider proliferation of the "offensive" imagery. The Law of Unintended Consequences will never be repealed.

    My vote is for "Gridlocks" - love the pun (and the truth therein.) And no issue with Pirates - the Giants and Cardinals each live in both leagues.

    The Cleveland team had a member of the Penobscot Nation, Louis Sockalexis, play for them in the 1890s, when they were known as the Spiders. Some players on other teams began calling them "Indians" as an insult. Whether that's the origin of their current team name is debatable. Maybe it's like the Wesleys, who were dubbed "Methodists" by mockers of their evangelistic meetings, then chose to adopt the name for their movement.
     
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Uh no its not. In fact it is an absurd suggestion.
     
  19. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Did I hear that the Sons of Confederates demand that the The United States Patent and Trademark Office cancel the New York Yankees trademark registration, calling the baseball team’s name “disparaging to Confederate- Americans.”
     
  20. OnlyaSinner

    OnlyaSinner Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    171
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wiki agrees that it's not the source of the name, but the following excerpt from the Wiki site suggests that "absurd" might be an exaggeration:


    With Lajoie gone, the Molly McGuires now needed a new nickname. Somers asked the local newspapers to come up with a new name, and based on their input, the team was renamed the Cleveland Indians.[20] Legend has it that the team honored Louis Sockalexis when it assumed its current name in 1915. Sockalexis, a Native American, had played in Cleveland 1897–99. Research indicates that this legend is mostly untrue, and that the new name was a play on the name of the Boston Braves, then known as the "Miracle Braves" after going from last place on July 4 to a sweep in the 1914 World Series. Proponents of the name acknowledged that the Cleveland Spiders of the National League had sometimes been informally called the "Indians" during Sockalexis' short career there, a fact which merely reinforced the new name
     
Loading...