Ron Paul: Obama's 'goal' is economic collapse

So where, on this thread, did I specifically defend his earmarks ?

Second, to point out that you have been inconsistent on the dems earmarks is ON topic. I pointed out your inconsistency by bringing up the War Funding bill.

And the topic of this thread is Obama's economic plans for America, not Dr, Paul's earmarks.

 

He tried that dishonest tactic with me as well.

And a very good point it was.

Baffles the mind does it not.

 

That it does. Little Green Footballs, (which USED to be a very good site, but has devolved into nothing but Charle's Johnson's own personality cult) used to have a great prayer posted on their home page....paraphrased


Lord, give me the courage to engage others in honest debate,
The strength to ignore the trolls,
And the wisdom to know the difference.

 

You might want to focus on that first statement: "Lord give me the courage to engage others in honest debate..."

 

A quick view of your posts shows that you typically offer little more than one-liner put downs.

That's fine if you believe that it strengthens your liberal positions and encourages us all to examine our own opinions and convinces us that the liberal view is the more correct view.

If not then you are wasting not only your own time but ours as well.

 

Excellent, Targus.

 

If you don't like what I post, don't read it, and certainly don't take the time to comment about it.

 

:laugh:

The subject matter is a little too deep for you, I'm guessing.

 

Yes, thank you for demonstrating my point.

 

Apparently the bill has provisions that requires dwelling houses to meet certain "green" criteria before they can be sold. My house is 42 old. Can you imagine how much it would cost to make it "green". I don't believe they are talking about green paint.

There have been a number of polls showing that liberals are less inclined toward God than Republicans. Frankly, but sadly, I believe their god is nature.

Heard today that "bo" wanted to give animals the right to sue humans!:tonofbricks:

 

HR2454 is 732 pages of legalise.

What are the chances that anyone read it before it was voted upon?

 

Can you please quote the bill's language? Sorry, but I think this is wrong.

They probably should sue us, but again, any evidence to support this? Again, I doubt you.

 

What does he mean by "round after round" of stimulus? Is he including the first tax check Bush gave us or is he referring to the one plan as "round after round"?

 

Cap and trade is two pronged, it is not just for the environment, it also reduces our dependence on oil and carbon emitting coal.

I keep seeing people saying things like this but never see any support for their argument. What is the nail in the economic coffin? Which numbers is being used to predict the nail? How will regulating appliances hurt the consumers?

Wasn't there a thread here a while back that talked about the dangers if you break one of these CFC bulbs? Don't you think Government should protect our children from the potential hazards or do you think we should let the makers put anything in our homes be it safe or not?

 

Think all you want, doubt all you want. The truth will out.

 

Explaine to usens who not edicated how it will reduce our dependence on foreign oil. We have plenty of oil off shore if the tree huggers would quit their pagan worship.

Everything will cost more LeBuick. You should be able to understand that.

Yes the government does a good job of protecting our children. 50 million unborn children slaughtered. You are really on a roll tonight LB!:laugh::laugh:

 

1. I didn't say our dependence on foreign oil, I said our dependence on oil period.

2. By finding alternative ways to create the energy we use.

Like you, may people doubted electricity and they had all kinds of evil slogans against it. It was because of investments and developments that we find it as safe, accepted and used like it is today. There is always those who believe there is nothing wrong with what we have when others try to advance us into the future.

To drill offshore will take major investing. If we're going to invest, why not invest in alternatives that won't harm the environment? I mean like wind or sun.

Not sure where you live, but we get a discount on our utility bill if we accept wind energy or agree to let them throttle back our AC during high demand periods. So excuse me for not accepting blanket statements like everything, what exactly are you saying will cost more.

 

Not if you tax more than you borrow and spend. Again, blanket statements and generalities are never absolute.

Businesses protect consumers? You mean like the meat packing plants that sold spoiled meat along with rats and workers body parts prior to the FDA? Are you joking, businesses protect consumers? The government is protecting the consumer from business because there is no way every American can be an expert on every product or industry.

Also, not all of want government to "do everything". However, when the nation moves in another direction like alternative energy then it helps to have someone putting up the investment capitol to keep the prices down for the consumers.

Again, blanket statements. Government doesn't micro manage "EVERY" aspect of our lives. We enjoy more freedom's in this nation than any other on earth (to my knowledge we do). It just seems strange to hear the people who have the most complaining about not having.