Ron Paul's Fiscal Hypocrisy

carpro · Feb 5, 2012

Havensdad said: ↑

Again, look at his record. He HAS introduced such bills. No one will go along with it, cause it bites the hand that feeds them.

Again, you did not answer the question. In the case of a given bill, Paul has the option of allowing executive bureaucrats in the Obama administration to have money to spend however they so desire, or he can earmark it, in accordance with his belief that all funds should be earmarked, and say what has to be done with the money. Which should he do?
Click to expand...

Then he hypocritically votes against them.

targus · Feb 5, 2012

Havensdad said: ↑

Again, look at his record. He HAS introduced such bills. No one will go along with it, cause it bites the hand that feeds them.

Again, you did not answer the question. In the case of a given bill, Paul has the option of allowing executive bureaucrats in the Obama administration to have money to spend however they so desire, or he can earmark it, in accordance with his belief that all funds should be earmarked, and say what has to be done with the money. Which should he do?
Click to expand...

Why is it that you only allow for an either/or?

Why doesn't Ron Paul earmark the money for constitutional purposes rather then for unconstitutional purposes that happen to be in his district?

Ron Paul's Fiscal Hypocrisy

carpro Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

targus New Member

Useful Searches

Ron Paul's Fiscal Hypocrisy

carpro Well-Known Member Site Supporter

targus New Member

carpro Well-Known Member
Site Supporter