Ruckman and KJV

Mostly he starts yelling insults at anyone that disagrees with him.

 

Intimidation.....

 

Mostly rage, invective, and sarcasm.

Actual Biblical support for Ruckman's position?: forget it. There is none.

 

Mostly rage, invective, and sarcasm.

Actual Biblical support for Ruckman's position?: forget it. There is none. </font>[/QUOTE]There are thousands of believers who will disagree with you on this.

 

If thousands of believers think there is biblical support for Ruckman's position, then why doesn't just one of them post some of that biblical support here?

 

Mostly rage, invective, and sarcasm.

Actual Biblical support for Ruckman's position?: forget it. There is none. </font>[/QUOTE]There are thousands of believers who will disagree with you on this. </font>[/QUOTE]Sure, just as there are thousands of believers who believe all sorts of aberrant theology- but yet nonetheless count as believers.

Fortunately there is a much larger majority of believers who reject (or would reject if they ever crossed paths with) Ruckmanism.

 

I cannot totally agree with all of Ruckmans teachings, but take the good spit out the bad. I've read some of his books and heard him preach, and if you ask me his sarcasm and insults often hit right home.

I said this once before, And I'll say it again my family has been called Ruckmanite, before we knew who Ruckman was. We have been to a Bible Baptitst Blowout at Ruckmans church, he asked everyone to stand that was called a Ruckmanite, before they knew who he was, WAY over half of the 500+ people that where there stood up.

That's because thier a bunch of &lt;attack deleted&gt; Forgive me if I'm starting to sound like Ruckman.

[ October 06, 2004, 03:18 PM: Message edited by: C4K ]

 

That's because their a bunch of &lt;attack deleted&gt; Forgive me if I'm starting to sound like Ruckman. </font>[/QUOTE]You haven't learned that when someone here supports Ruckman or his belief in KJVO they are very susceptible to having their post edited, more so that those who support MVs. The irony of this is that this is often done by moderators who "claim" they love and use the KJV. Go figure.

 

OK Terry, I'll go figure and here's what I figure: He has published words to the affect that the NT canon was not closed until 1611.

Why?

He has publicky stated in his writings that there are indeed errors in the 1611KJV but that these errors are "advanced revelation" inserted by the Holy Spirit unbeknowns to the KJV translators who made these "errors" that the Holy Spirit was guiding and inspiring them to do so. He alone having discovered over 200 of these advanced revelations (at last count) in fact he wrote a book about them.

This is the Latin Vulgate error DeJaVu all over again.

So, yes I love and cherish the KJV and yes I love Brother Ruckman as my brother but I wholeheartedly disagree with his "advanced revelation" and "re-inspiration" theories.


HankD

 

Name calling, slander, myths, aliens in UFO's, 10 foot tall supernatural beings with black lips, etc...are all tools used by Ruckman to support his theories.

Even when I was a hard core KJVO I could not stomach the false prophet Ruckman.

Would any Ruckman supporter explain the Black lipped antichrist to me?

http://www.kjvonly.org/bob/ross_black_lip.htm

This alone proves Ruckman to be a nutcase and a heretic. He is adding to the bible.

Also:

http://www.kjvonly.org/bob/ross_ruck_gov.htm

http://www.kjvonly.org/bob/ross_ruck_reprieve.htm

http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/kutilek_ruckman_on_luther.htm

 

I've seen that type of reasoning before. Most KJVOist use it to defend the works based salvation found in Rev 22:14 in the KJV vs. grace that is found in most modern translations of Rev 22:14.

Rev. 22:14,"Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city." KJV

Rev. 22:14,"Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter by the gates into the city." NASB

Basically Ruckman would rather make a doctrine then to admit that the NASB renders this verse better to support grace.

 

Ruckman is like other people, some of what he says is good and some of what he says is not so good.

 

I think tha not-so-good is symbolically called "leaven", Terry.

 

Terry_Herrington said:

Ruckman is like other people, some of what he says is good and some of what he says is not so good.

"a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump" (1 Cor. 5:6)