Rush Limbaugh offers challenge to Ried

Limbaugh's 20 million listeners represent about 7% of the American population.

 

Is that what the spirit inside you says?

 

I imagine Rush's contribution might amount to less than two weeks earnings.

 

I don't think Rush makes $100 million a year, in fact, I have seen numbers of $30 million, which is certainly an awful lot of money. But if this figure is correct, $2 million dollars would equate to just under three and one-half weeks worth of income.

Either way it is a lot of money and Rush can surely afford it.

 

It's a matter of having observed politics since 1964.

 

We get what the voters want for the most part. Many times it might not be what you want or even what I want. I've observed them longer than you and it does not make my view any better or worse than yours. :tonofbricks:

 

Left, right, left, right. Just two sides of the same agenda is all. The agenda being to bring the United States to ruin so it can be more easily sovietized and merged into a New World Order. You know, the same NWO George H. W. Bush talked about. His son's administration refers to it as the "international community", a kinder more gentler euphemism for global tyranny.

 

I certainly agree.

 

I am quite familiar with Neil Boortz. He is a libertarian. He has spoken at the Libertarian Party national convention. As I agree with him pretty much except for issues such as the Iraq conflict and abortion. Here is his blog:

http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html

 

The central planks in the Democratic party are the murder of babies and the legitimization of sodomy. It's hard to see a Democrat as anything but a monster.

 

You do realize that you have just called millions of your brothers and sisters in Christ monsters, don't you? :tear:

 

I don't consider those who knowingly support a party known for its militant stand to murder babies and legitimize sodomy my brothers and sisters.

 

Don't worry about it Ken, many cowards use the Internet to say things they would never say in person, just consider the source.

 

Fortunately, you don't get to decide that.

 

Senator Reid's Senatorial power is not his to use any way he sees fit, but he didn't mind using it to send a letter that is arguably one of the most egregious examples of the abuse of senatorial power in history.

I think that, if he were an honorable man, he would have backed up his abuse of power with his money. Especially for what he admitted is a very worthy cause.

Guess not.

 

Depending, of course, on one's definition of "evil", I believe it is.

 

Or at least admit his impropriety in drafting the letter. But honor is not in him. IMO

 

The spelling is hypocritical, didn't you go to school? I think if you look at what Aaron did in questioning my salvation was clearly against the rules. I felt compelled to respond.

The odd thing is that Aaron would assume I am pro-abortion, I'm not. Just look at my posting concerning the best thing President Bush has done and you will see that I mentioned him signing the Partial-Birth Abortion Bill as his greatest achievement. But, of course someone like Aaron only assumes what he wants to be the facts and then goes on the attack.