1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Scientific Racism and Supremacy.

Discussion in 'Science' started by jcrawford, Jul 6, 2005.

  1. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    Barbarian observes:
    Mitochondrial Eve" is not the Biblical Eve.... Because there were humans before her. She was not the first woman, merely the last common female ancestor."

    No one knows.

    That makes no sense, Karl.

    Barbarian observes:
    The Bill of Rights prohibits creationism from being taught in schools."

    No one teaches racism in public schools.
     
  2. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    QUOTE = Originally posted by The Galatian:

    "No one teaches racism in public schools."

    Neo-Darwinist theories about the origin and evolution of the human race are racist.
     
  3. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    Barbarian observes:
    No one teaches racism in public schools.

    Nope. Just your personal definition, with no connection to reality.
     
  4. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    QUOTE = Originally posted by The Galatian:

    "Nope. Just your personal definition, with no connection to reality."

    Nope. Neo-Darwinist theories about the origin, evolution and ancestry of various human species are a form of scientific racism according to Professor Marvin L. Lubenow in his 2004 edition of "Bones of Contention," published by BakerBooks.

    Really.
     
  5. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK Its just not you personally but its you and Professor Marvin L. Lubenow togehter that have a personal definition with no connection to reality.
     
  6. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's personal and disconnected from reality about the American Oxford Dictionary's several definitions of the word 'race?' If you can't find it on-line, I'd be happy to post it for your benefit.
     
  7. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neo-Darwinist theories of human evolution are racist because they imply that all modern racial and ethnic groups only originated and 'evolved' from species of apes in Africa.

    If an evolutionary theory claimed that all the members of the present human race descended from some female ancestor in Asia or Europe, that would be a form of scientific racism also.

    The African Eve Model of human evolution is racist because it associates the current human race with an African woman's tribe whom neo-Darwinist theorists say originated from a non-human species of apes. It's a form of scientific racism when evolutionary theorists point to an African woman's tribe as the original descendents of some non-human species of apes.
     
Loading...