Scriptural proofs for KJVOnlyism

And I'm still waiting for scriptural proof that God only preserved his word in faulty manuscripts.

What is more astounding and troubling is that you can't even see that your position lacks the "scriptural proof" you demand from KJVOnlyists! (I mean, you either have to laugh or cry)
</font>[/QUOTE]More evasion? It is very unbecoming of someone who supposedly values truth. I hold that the scriptures are authoritative and correct in everything they address. But they do not address every aspect of what we are discussing. They do establish principles such as accepting the truth without preconditions that limit its impact, searching an issue out, holding to that which is true, etc.

I ask for either scriptural or historical proof. I started two different threads in attempt to avoid the type of evasion that you are employing now.

Your point is meaningless. No one on our side of this debate is telling you not to use or trust the KJV. However, any time you present a false and degrading statement on scripture, it is a duty to oppose your error and demand proof for it. Especially when you condemn other versions and by extension those that use them.