Scripture Verse Basis for AVonly

[off topic snipped]

[ August 23, 2004, 10:29 PM: Message edited by: Dr. Bob ]

 

Psr.2, do you reject the Bible preservation?

 

Wrong again Bob. I asked you to discuss scriptual content of several verses on several occasions. I have asked by open forum and private message and you have not ever responded.
My request was for you to discuss content rather than version bickering.
It would appear you are a combination of uninterested and unable.
I'd advise you to change study toopics and get back to school.

 

Read the preface of the 1611 (your 1769 revision/edition most likely doesn't have it) where the translators of the KJV/kjb acknowledged their dependence on the Originals. Were the translators of the KJV:kjb liars?

 

"Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh"...and boy does it speak!

 

Here is my post that you mis-interpreted.
Great post Dr. Bob..Not. Just more dung to prove you cannot discuss scripture content only versions and that right poorly.
Mess with God's book(KJB) and God messed up your mind.
The truth stands shining just as it has since God inspired the KJB and you and your little kiddie friends can't see it.
Great bow-tie though.

You have continually tried to discredit me and mock me . You have yet to display any ability to discuss the verses I have asked you to at a level that could keep me awake.

Pity you can dish out trash but can't take it.
You have jumped in on a thread of mine with absolute garbage and then left never to return.
It is a SMALL person who dishes out what he cannot take Bob and that is exactly what I see in you.

 

So Orvie which of the KJB translators do you know?
Pathetic

 

Hypocrite I think most KJVO's:kjbo's are wise enough to distance themselves from your childishness.

 

Have you forgotten they lived over 400 years ago? read their preface, it'll help you with your pickle.

 

I just proved that Bob slandered me and you call me a hypocrite.
Better check the dictionary Orvie. Or were you using dynamic equiv.?
HA hA

 

Read my post and s-l-o-w-l-y. I said you or anyone you know.
Pickle? Bread and butter pickle for me,thanks.

 

A hypocrite is one who doesn't practice what they preach, one who says one thing and does another. Therefore if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck..it must be a duck. Quack

 

Good night Mr psr.2. You really are alot of fun to debate. (I gotta wake early, so see ya. )

 

So do you believe in the Geneva inspiration?

 

psr.2:Great post Dr. Bob..Not. Just more dung to prove you cannot discuss scripture content only versions and that right poorly.

If you wannabee a little Rucky, at least learn the difference between 'right' & 'WRITE'. Even psr.1 knows THAT much.


Mess with God's book(KJB) and God messed up your mind.

YOUR example shows the truth of this!


The truth stands shining just as it has since God inspired the KJB and you and your little kiddie friends can't see it.
Great bow-tie though.

Well, we see you're about 1/3 of the way thru Rucky-Mon Institute's Pseudo-Righteous Insults 101, and you're failing.

But obviously you don't wanna answer Dr. Bob's plain, direct question.

 

psr.2:You do not have original autographs. No one you know has them. They do not exist. Don't try to kid me or anyone else.

But they DID.

 

3:16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness

Where's KJVO mentioned? Or the KJV at all?

Is the NIV Scripture? If not, why?

Is the Geneva Bible Scripture? if not, why?

 

The source texts that the KJV translators used are readily available today in many bookstores. You can also order them online. You're right when you say I can hold the KJ Bible in my hand. You're wrong when you say I cannot hold the TR in my hand. I'm holding it in my hand right now.

However, your comment is off-topic. Please provide scriptural support for a single-translation-only position. If you can provide such scriptural support, I will be the first to adopt a single-translation-only position.