1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Scripture Verse Basis for AVonly

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Dr. Bob, Aug 23, 2004.

Top Posters
Page 3 of 3
  1. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    John - psr2 is taking a vacation from the BB, but your statement is the logical conclusion of my original question.

    IF one can show scriptural support, then we should most certainly accept and believe it.

    IF not, then one can CHOOSE to believe it by faith alone. Or reject it out of hand.
     
    #41 Dr. Bob, Aug 25, 2004
  2. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The usual KJVO answer is another question, to-wit: "Please provide Scriptural support for the MV position." My usual answers are to read from the KJV the comparisons between Luke 4:16-21 and Isaiah 42:7 & 61:1-3. as well as Acts 8 & Isaiah 53. OH YEAH...and 2 Timothy 3:16.

    Unlike the KJVOs, WE answer THEIR questions.

    This is the umpteenth chance over more than 30 years that they've been openly given to answer a simple little request that would elevate their doctrine from "myth" status. But please, don't anyone hold yer breath waiting for an answer...ya might become a little cyanotic...
     
    #42 robycop3, Aug 25, 2004
  3. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of course, you and I know that the problem with that statement is there's no such thing as an "MV" position. There's only the position that single-translation-onlyism has scriptural support, or the position that single-translation-onlyism lacks scriptural support.
     
    #43 Johnv, Aug 25, 2004
  4. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Exactly, Johnv. And that is why Dr.Bob asked for scriptural proof.

    Our little Miss Ruck-linger is always so fast with proof-texts, and cutting and pasting entire chapters of Scripture, but what she (and psr.2, and Anti-A, and AVBunyan, and...and...and...) fail to acknowledge is that those exact same Scriptures apply to all translations.

    There has never been ANY Scriptural support for KJVOnlyism (or any other versionism), nor will there ever be any...unless you follow Ruckman's shenanagins about modern day revelation (or is that the Mormons...sorta the same to me).

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
    #44 Trotter, Aug 25, 2004
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 3
Loading...