I have a thought here that I have often wondered about and though someone here might have something here to contribute. I understand that some of the early church fathers believed that the original Septuagint was perfect and Inspired – 70 all read the same. Justin Martyr taught this and was furious that the new versions changed Virgin to young woman. The translators of the KJV, on the other hand, say the Septuagint was made in hast and contained errors – made in 72 days. Does any one still hold the original Septuagint that Jesus is presumed to have read from, to be perfect and without error? And if in error then could it be argued that a good translation is still God’s word and doesn’t need to be perfect (Inspired and Plenary) to be the Word of God?