1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Should God have compassion?

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by BobRyan, Sep 5, 2005.

  1. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hi HonSola,

    Tell me then if God's heart is for all to be saved then why doesn't He save everyone?
    </font>[/QUOTE]Better yet, why does He select some over others for salvation? Your reply will be the answer to your own strawman.
     
  2. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I "changed nothing" - I quoted Jonah 4 "exactly" AND THEN asked a question.

    If you have a way out of that - please show it.

    So far you are simply observing that my question was MY WORDs -- and the quote was "a quote".

    This is not "substantive".

    God asks Jonah if he should have mercy as in Abraham asking God "SHALL NOT the judge of all the earth do right?" Gen 18:25. The "game ends" with playing around on that question God asks to Jonah.

    The point is that HE ASKS about what SHOULD be and then GIVES evidence for His decision. Objective external facts rather than arbitrary "Selection" on "whim".

    So what is your answer.

    Was it really a "calvinist" model?
     
  3. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    If as Bob says God is obligated to save Ninevah why is He not obliged to save everyone. This is not a figment is iot webdog?

    He chooses who ever for salvation as Ninevah shows.

    john.
     
  4. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't believe God is obligated to save anyone outside of His requirements for salvation. If God put's the requirements for salvation out there, and tells us we will be saved if we follow them, God IS obligated to save those people. If He didn't, He would be a liar and not God.
    If I told you that if you followed me around my city for a day, and in return I promise to give you $1000, am I obligated to give you the money if you fulfil your end of the requirement? God put the requirements for salvation plain as day, and if we accept them, He will fulfil His end of the deal. If we don't, He won't.
     
  5. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    As to God's obligation to save Nineveh, if He told Jonah to preach that if they turn from wickedness He will spare them, and they did, God is obligated to fulfil His end or He would be a liar. Notice their safety was contingent on them turning from wickedness. They were destroyed at a future date for not keeping their end of the deal.
     
  6. Kiffen

    Kiffen Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Messages:
    642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually Jonah did not preach Repentance to Ninevah. It was a message of Judgment BUT the fear of God led them to Repentance and to rest on His Grace.

    I think in all of this we see that the Ninevites,

    1. BELIEVED THE WORD OF GOD - That Ninevah would be destroyed

    2.THEY REPENTED - Though they were not told to in Jonah’s sermon, the fear of God brought forth repentance in their hearts.

    2 Tim. 2:25
    In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

    3. THEY RESTED ON THE GRACE OF GOD

    Jonah's message offered no grace, no mercy but the Ninevites through the conviction of the Holy Spirit through the Word of God rested on the Grace of God.
     
  7. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello webdog.

    So He never really forgave them just postponed judgement. Strange forgiveness that isn't it? Strange mercy.

    john.
     
  8. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    So He never really forgave them just postponed judgement. Strange forgiveness that isn't it? Strange mercy.

    john.
    </font>[/QUOTE]John, your are something else :D
    He did forgive them. When He destroyed them, it was a separate act.

    You steal something. The judge can put you in jail, but forgives the crime and puts you on probation instead. You steal again. You are saying all future punishment for stealing should be forgiven because the first one was? The judge put's you in jail this time. You would say to him "I thought you REALLY forgave me, why are you putting me in jail"?

    [ September 06, 2005, 11:51 AM: Message edited by: webdog ]
     
  9. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello webdog.
    A judge cannot forgive a crime but can show leniency and place a person on probation. If that person commits a crime within a specified time period the old charge will be applied with full force. Probation isn't forgiveness.

    No I'm not saying it should be I'm saying it is. For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves, 14 in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. Col 1:14. Of course my sins are not counted against me. Jesus died for me, in my place, for my sins. A full and free pardon from the King of the Universe for me is assured. I am free. :cool: Jesus took my punishment

    I thought He really forgave me? Are you saying He hasn't? :cool:

    It's what I said yesterday: You will not find a good Calvinist ask an Arminian. Be perfect then webdog.

    Believe it or not you are not the first to say that. :cool:


    john.
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I won't get into this back and forth thing again, but I will say that Nineveh was a wicked city, not a city of believers. You are jumping around using atonement as the basis for God's punishment on them. God put a consequence for Nineveh's actions and a result based on their choice. This did not cover all future choices or actions of that city.
     
  11. TexasSky

    TexasSky Guest

    I don't think it is our place to ask what qualities God should or should not have, but rather, what qualities does the bible show that He has.
     
  12. bruren777

    bruren777 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    0
    TexasSky, I agree with you 100%.

    The Bible say's it, I believe it and that's it!


    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  13. whatever

    whatever New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,088
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dear Bob,

    It really is simple. Jonah 4 does not address whether God is obligated to have mercy. It does address whether it would be wrong for God to show mercy. By using Jonah 4 as support for your question you misused scripture.

    You just did it again, in that last post. You said "God asks Jonah if he should have mercy ...". No, God did not ask Jonah if He should have mercy. God asked Jonah if He should not have mercy.

    Later you said this:

    No, Bob, that is not what He asks. Your argument simply will not work unless you leave out a word that scripture leaves in.

    Please quote scripture correctly.

    Your friend,

    whatever
     
  14. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I am playing catch-up reading all the posts since I signed on last -- but here is what I "suspect" our Calvinists have been doing...


    1. Question in OP

    What is GOD's argument IN THE TEXT for why HE SHOULD have mercy on them?

    Answer: God EXPLICITLY states that HE created them (whereas Jonah did NOT create the plant) and they are ignorant and there are many animals in the city. God gives THESE REASONS for why He SHOULD have mercy INSTEAD of saying "I am sovereign I can do what I want so why SHOULD you be telling Me I Should NOT do as I please either way??"

    These details already pointed out in my Sept 5 post.

    But the Likely Answer from Calvinists: "Dead silence". (Calvinists engaged in Detail-avoidance)

    2. Speaking of my "Sept 5 posts"

    Likely answer so far from Calvinists: "Dead Silence"

    (Calvinists engaged in Detail-avoidance - fleeing from the text)

    Of course my "expectations" might be wrong. I will now read through the post history to see if we really do have dead silence on the specific points brought out on page 1 of this thread.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  15. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Interesting "spin".

    God does NOT highlight the Calvinist ANSWER as to why Jonah SHOULD NOT be allowed to question if God has the RIGHT to show mercy (or as to whether God is DOING WRONG to show mercy).

    And that "Calvinist answer" would be that GOD IS SOVEREIGN and can do as He pleases showing mercy as capriciously as He so desires.

    INSTEAD God points to external objective arguments AS IF they have anything AT ALL to do with Why God SHOULD show mercy!!

    Certainly they DO have everything to do with it - as predicted by the Arminian model.

    But the REASONS given IN THE TEXT have NOTHING to do with justifying God's right to show mercy in the Calvinist model!

    This is blatantly obvious.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  16. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Here is the text.

    Calvinists - please "notice the details".

    God argues that Noah SHOULD NOT be angry by asking the negative according to the Hebrew and eastern custome 9Then God said to Jonah, "Do you have good reason to be angry about the plant?"

    Details for Calvinists to ignore: (Enumerated)

    #1. The implied answer is "no". Jonah beggs to differ with that "statement" made in the form of a question by insisting that to the contrary - HE DOES have good reason to be angry.

    #2. God points out that HE is the one that MADE the plant and cause it to grow. Implying that Jonah was having compassion on a plant when in fact he did not have AS MUCH grounds for compassion as God - who by reason of HIS OWN role as "MAKER" And "SUSTAINER" of the plant had more right to compassion by these EXTERNAL facts of work.

    #3. God then makes the SAME kind of "statement-in-the-form-of-question" that HE SHOULD have compassion on Nineveh. "SHOULD I NOT have compassion" where the negative (implied negative) is "YES YOU SHOULD" vs "NO you should NOT".

    #4. Then the REASONS God gives are NOT the Calvinist reasons of "sovereign fickle will gets to do as it pleases". RATHER it is EXTERNAL object facts that argue for God having mercy - in this case GOD says HE SHOULD have mercy because of the large numbers of people, because of their living in darkness and because of the other creatures in that city.

    Good "Arminian" REASONS - but hardly getting a mention when not outright DENIED by the Calvinist model.

    See?

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  17. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    As was pointed out on page 1 -

    But instead - God argues that Jonah's way in this case -- is wrong NOT because it questions God BUT BECAUSE of the OBJECTIVE FACTS listed about the city!!

    How "Arminian"!!

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  18. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Was Moses a "good Calvinist" or a bad one?

    </font>[/QUOTE]Note that Moses DID NOT ACCEPT that sovereign decision!

    So Moses "Good or bad"??!!

    Certainly his mediation made for BAD CALVINISM! (4 and 5 pt Calvinism that is)

    IN Christ,

    Bob
     
  19. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Abraham argues "SHOULD NOT" the judge of all the earth do right.

    Calvinists argue that this is an argument that "God SHOULD NOT DO RIGHT"

    hahaha ;)

    What "Should" God say to Abraham??

    SHOULD He say "The number of people in the city that are righteous has nothing to do with what I sovereignly decide to do"

    SHOULD God say "your silly little arguments for WHY I should spare the city -- have nothing to do with my Sovereign will or whether I will destroy the city".

    Did God make a mistake in that discussion?

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  20. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bandwidth Bob is back I see. :cool:

    john.
     
Loading...