Should You Chip Your Children?

I didn't know that was a freedom guaranteed or threatened. You probably think way too highly of yourself if you think the government wants to track you. As for me, follow me. Let's have a conversation and it won't be long until we are talking about Jesus.

I didn't know that was possible. According to my knowledge of the law, you can't kidnap your own children unless you don't have legal custody. This is why I think you tend to just make stuff up regardless of what is actually true. You present what seems impossible scenarios.

I am with MP on this one. I see some of the benefits. I am cautious however. The jury is still out, particularly since it is completely irrelevant.

 

I doubt that a computer database will be interested.

 

That's why I don't give it a second thought, as to "The Mark of the Beast", but only as a potentially fantastic tool for finding lost ones. I doubt anyone will propose it being mandatory, unless perhaps for certain felons and the like, until after the Body of Christ is removed.

 

Because of the world wide knowledge concerning the "Mark" and the nearly universal condemnation against it, it'll probably be perfected in these last years, but not implemented until lawlessness and civil disobedience has become epidemic. Then since the restraint provided by the believers is by then gone, there will probably be much support for it.

 

I agree. It won't be able to follow me, and certainly won't arrest me. Man, you guys are paranoid with apparently no awareness of what Christ said: "All authority has bem given me in heaven and earth."

This stuff gets funny after a while.

 

I personally find thd gospel the only potentially fantastic tool and Jesus is the one who finds lost ones. It really simplifies this other stuff.

 

I will not support it under any circumstances.

 

But government officials who have control of the database can.

 

Yes, but it's highly doubtful they would given the real problems facing them. You are so paranoid.

 

Assuming you are a born again believer, you won't be here to lend support or opposition.

 

Well in that vein, I couldn't agree more.

 

Yes, I will.

 

Q: Should you chip your children?





A: Probably not. Kids make terrible mulch.

 

The wood chipper was my first thought as well... I sadly admit.

 

Now that there's funny, rbell.

 

Then I'm so sorry.

 

You, sir, are not paranoid enough. As someone once joked, "it ain't paranoia if they really are watching you."

It was announced yesterday that the FBI continuously spied on Coretta King for four years after her husband's death.

Remember the whole "cameras on street corners" thread?

We currently have people being stopped in airports because their name is on a list. Now, imagine, if you will, the "boon" chipping everyone would provide these folks: Instead of watching for names on a list, you first determine if an individual is on the "chip list." If so, you remotely turn on the GPS signal and determine where the individual is. Watch them for a couple of days, marking locations, and comparing those locations to intelligence reports about known gathering locations. If the individual visits any of these, you can legally bring them in for questioning, because they've acted suspiciously.

Doesn't matter that the Pastor Larry they're looking for has a different skin color; your name was on the list, and you visited one or more of the suspicious locations.

 

If the person was a terrorist, a rapist, a child molester, I would not have one iota of a problem of that person's whereabouts being tracked.

If a child came up missing, the chip would either prove the person was in the area at the time the child disappeared, or it would exonerate him proving he was nowhere near.

I believe it would even deter such crimes if one could not provide an airtight alibi when the chip showed different.

This chip is not the mark of the beast. It is already being used in other countries. It cannot be the mark. But it is a forerunner of the mark.