So, still think President Obama is a closet Muslim...

And therein, lies an opportunity God is using to reach Muslims. They begin to question what they are doing to each other. It makes them more open to Biblical Christianity. (This from a veteran missionary in a Muslim country)

 

I Have No Reason to Believe Different!

In order to hide something so socially detrimental to his political career, I believe Obama would go as far as to sacrifice the radical side of his closet religion in order to remain undiscovered! :laugh:

 

I agree 100%. He is not a Muslim or terrorist. The Republicans that are running are also consummate politicians, with the possible exception of Paul and Cain. (Let me guess, there are those on this board who would not vote for Cain because he slew Abel). There is no way I would vote for anti-Constitutional candidates like Romney, Gingrich, Palin, or Perry. They are not running to serve the American people, but themselves to our taxes and power. The differences between these clowns and Obama is cosmetic, and if that is the best the Republicans can do, they will lose again, regardless of the economy.

 

I disagree in Obama's case. He is decidedly NOT like most Presidents. He has taken a road that is very unlike most of our former leaders.

He has proven to be very sympathetic to the Muslim cause, even while using a few incidents to gain sympathy and a following from his opposition in America. In that case, he is as much implicated in following a Marxist dialectic than in turning tail against Muslim people -- for he has not!

He is decidedly anti-Israel. He is decidedly Marxist-socialist. He is decidedly liberal. He is decidedly slippery. And, he is the most dangerous man that we have ever elected to the presidency of the United States of America in our entire history -- akin to the Republic of Germany electing Hitler, who eventually lead them to destruction by adopting first the same form of Marxist-socialism. We often draw a big distinction between fascism and communism, but it is mainly one of degree, not of opposition as is often thought. The roots are the same -- centralized power in the hands of government and resultant control of the people through that power.