I was hoping this subject would be brought up. Not to cause division but I really want to know what other fundamentalists believe about this. (Please, no tomatoes yet!) I brought it up on another thread, but unfortunately, the thread was hijacked by those who embrace the RCC and other things. I want to see proof on both sides, without fear of intimidation, berating, other doctrines, just the SCRIPTURES which is all I was asking for on the other thread. I will not accept tomatoes for an answer. Why does this subject have to be dropped as suggested by someone else? Why can't we dig in what the Scriptures have to say? If ya'll want to kick me off because I'm bringing this up, then I'll go, but why can't this be discussed? My line of reasoning is this: Perfect sacrifice for sin (spotless without blemish) in the Old Testament. Christ is the Passover Lamb. He was born of a virgin, thus could not have sinful blood of human passed on through by mankind. His Blood was righteous enough to be acceptable on the Mercy Seat. How could human blood be an acceptable sacrifice for sin? Where is this line of reasoning skewed? To me, this is digging into the MEAT of the Scriptures. Are we up to discussing this as adults with Scriptural Proof for our positions? Or does everyone just wish I would go away and leave you to milk? PS: If you throw tomatoes, please only throw ones that are not over ripe so I can eat them!